- 
+
|
|
- 
+
|
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@
+
Namestitev KDE SC 4.4.0
@@ -218,6 +219,6 @@
Stiki z mediji
--- trunk/www/sites/www/announcements/4.4/index.php #1087756:1087757
@@ -1,8 +1,4 @@
+
+9th February 2010 - KDE SC 4.4.0 Released
+
+"KDE Ships New KDE SC 4.4.0."
+
+
1st February 2010 - KDE SC 4.4 RC3 Released
--- trunk/www/sites/www/index.php #1087756:1087757
@@ -12,12 +12,12 @@
$page_title = "Experience Freedom!";
$templatepath = "chihuahua/";
$teaser = true;
-include "header.inc";
+include "header.inc";
?>
Get KDE Software
-
+
Latest News
Read More
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
-KDE Software Compilation 4.4 Release Candidate 3 released
-On 1st February 2010, KDE Software Compilation 4.4 RC3 was released. KDE SC 4.4 RC3 is the third release candidate of a new major release in the KDE 4 series, aimed at testers to identify show-stopper bugs.
+ KDE Software Compilation 4.4.0 Released
+On 9th February 2010, KDE Software Compilation 4.4.0 was released. KDE Software Compilation 4.4.0 introduces a new netbook interface, native window tabbing and the KAuth authentication Framework, among other improvements and new applications.
KDE Software Compilation 4.3.5 released
--- trunk/www/sites/www/info/releases.php #1087756:1087757
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Current KDE Releases
-KDE 4.3.5 (stable version, suitable for everyone)
+KDE 4.4.0 (stable version, suitable for everyone)
@@ -16,13 +16,15 @@
very conservative users, but showing its age)
+
Previous KDE Releases
+- KDE 4.3.5
- KDE 4.3.4
- KDE 4.3.3
- KDE 4.3.2
From aacid at kde.org Wed Feb 10 01:12:53 2010
From: aacid at kde.org (Albert Astals Cid)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:12:53 +0000
Subject: extragear and playground translations included in l10n tarballs
of kde 4.4.0 ?
In-Reply-To: <4B702DBD.8030408@kde.org>
References:
<4B702DBD.8030408@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002100012.53423.aacid@kde.org>
A Dilluns, 8 de febrer de 2010, Eike Hein va escriure:
> On 02/08/2010 03:52 AM, Tobias Gerschner wrote:
> > A clarification would be appreciated whether it is intended to ship
> > translations of extragear and playground applications now with the KDE
> > SC .
>
> This only applies to the SVN tag, and was presumably done
> by accident. The 4.4.0 tarballs don't contain the Extragear
> translations and there are no plans to include them there.
>
Dirk are you going to fix this or want me to do it?
Albert
From tobias.gerschner at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 01:18:41 2010
From: tobias.gerschner at gmail.com (Tobias Gerschner)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:18:41 +1300
Subject: extragear and playground translations included in l10n tarballs
of kde 4.4.0 ?
In-Reply-To: <4B702DBD.8030408@kde.org>
References:
<4B702DBD.8030408@kde.org>
Message-ID:
2010/2/9 Eike Hein :
> On 02/08/2010 03:52 AM, Tobias Gerschner wrote:
>> A clarification would be appreciated whether it is intended to ship
>> translations of extragear and playground applications now with the KDE
>> SC .
>
> This only applies to the SVN tag, and was presumably done
> by accident. The 4.4.0 tarballs don't contain the Extragear
> translations and there are no plans to include them there.
>
Hi Eike,
Thanks for the clarification. All sorted now here.
--
Tobias Gerschner
Yoper Linux - www.yoper.com
Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.
From sebastian at trueg.de Tue Feb 9 11:10:59 2010
From: sebastian at trueg.de (Sebastian Trueg)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:10:59 +0000
Subject: KDE/kdelibs/nepomuk/query
Message-ID: <1265710259.107695.15109.nullmailer@svn.kde.org>
SVN commit 1087529 by trueg:
Ported mem/dbus connection leak from Akonadi.
CCMAIL: faure at kde.org, release-team at kde.org, thiago at kde.org
M +1 -0 queryserviceclient.cpp
--- trunk/KDE/kdelibs/nepomuk/query/queryserviceclient.cpp #1087528:1087529
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@
Nepomuk::Query::QueryServiceClient::~QueryServiceClient()
{
close();
+ delete d->queryServiceInterface;
delete d;
}
From sebastian at trueg.de Tue Feb 9 11:11:27 2010
From: sebastian at trueg.de (Sebastian Trueg)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:11:27 +0000
Subject: branches/KDE/4.4/kdelibs/nepomuk/query
Message-ID: <1265710287.741250.15190.nullmailer@svn.kde.org>
SVN commit 1087530 by trueg:
Backport of mem/dbus connection leak.
CCMAIL: faure at kde.org, release-team at kde.org, thiago at kde.org
M +1 -0 queryserviceclient.cpp
--- branches/KDE/4.4/kdelibs/nepomuk/query/queryserviceclient.cpp #1087529:1087530
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@
Nepomuk::Query::QueryServiceClient::~QueryServiceClient()
{
close();
+ delete d->queryServiceInterface;
delete d;
}
From bald at smail.ee Tue Feb 9 15:15:23 2010
From: bald at smail.ee (Marek Laane)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:15:23 +0200
Subject: www/sites/www
In-Reply-To: <1265724356.536189.19062.nullmailer@svn.kde.org>
References: <1265724356.536189.19062.nullmailer@svn.kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002091615.24269.bald@smail.ee>
teisip?ev, 09. veebruar 2010 16:05:56 kirjutas Sebastian K?gler:
> SVN commit 1087757 by sebas:
>
> Release KDE Software Compilation 4.4.0
>
> Congrats, everyone!
>
> CCMAIL:release-team at kde.org
>
>
> M +7 -6 announcements/4.4/index-sl.php
> M +0 -4 announcements/4.4/index.php
> M +6 -0 announcements/index.php
> M +4 -4 index.php
> M +4 -2 info/releases.php
>
It'd be even better if you had at once deleted from translations that "cheap
hiding trick", too, whuch is preventing to see translation now...
From mitchell at kde.org Mon Feb 15 08:21:15 2010
From: mitchell at kde.org (Jeff Mitchell)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:21:15 -0500
Subject: Contacting the release coordinators re: critical security vuln
Message-ID: <4B78F5EB.1000802@kde.org>
As you guys probably know by now, we have a patch for a critical
security vuln. Although it was disclosed publicly, the packagers were
notified on the kde-packager list today and we're giving packagers a
couple of days to roll new packages (Monday is a holiday here in the US).
However, the security policy says to contact the release coordinators in
the event of a situation where an immediate fix is necessary. I'm not
sure whether this is simply so one of you guys can put it out on
kde-announce or whether it's because we're supposed to roll new, patched
tarballs.
So consider this my notification to you guys that whatever it is that is
supposed to be done needs to start getting done :-) Sorry to be vague,
but I'll answer any direct questions if possible.
--Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20100215/c01a8941/attachment.sig
From mpyne at kde.org Mon Feb 15 22:08:24 2010
From: mpyne at kde.org (Michael Pyne)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:08:24 -0500
Subject: Fwd: Am I the only person that ever checks sha1sums? :)
Message-ID: <201002151608.31098.mpyne@kde.org>
Release Team,
Apparently SHA1 sums are wrong on some of the tarballs? (See below)
Regards,
- Michael Pyne
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Am I the only person that ever checks sha1sums? :)
Date: Monday 15 February 2010, 14:54:53
From: Charles Johnston
To: kde-devel at kde.org
The two files:
kdebase-4.4.0.tar.bz2
and
oxygen-icons-4.3.5.tar.bz2
do not match the sha1sums that are listed for them.
Either the sums or the files are messed up.
Any idea why? Did they get re-rolled and somebody forget
to update the sums?
Thanks
Charles Johnston
charles at infoplatter.com
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe
<<
-----------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20100215/d10de9dd/attachment.sig
From hubnerd at ntlworld.com Tue Feb 16 04:31:32 2010
From: hubnerd at ntlworld.com (David Hubner)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:31:32 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
Message-ID: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com>
Hi,
Just forwarding a discussion to the release-team mailing list. Is it
possible to move KInfoCenter to kdebase-workspace?
Thanks
( PS: Been having mail problems all day so I hope this does not get sent
twice )
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:07:48 -0800
From: Aaron J. Seigo
Reply-To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
On February 14, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
> Who would I talk to, to get it moved to kdebase-workspace? I don't want
> to move it in SVN and then get told off by the build team :)
more the release team. the build is easy :)
maybe ask on kde-packagers@ and release-team@; otherwise, as one of the
occupants of workspace i'd welcome kinfocenter there. personally i think
it's
the kind of app that makes sense as part of the workspace.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
From winter at kde.org Tue Feb 16 13:29:43 2010
From: winter at kde.org (Allen Winter)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:29:43 -0500
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
In-Reply-To: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com>
References: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com>
Message-ID: <201002160729.43688.winter@kde.org>
On Monday 15 February 2010 10:31:32 pm David Hubner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just forwarding a discussion to the release-team mailing list. Is it
> possible to move KInfoCenter to kdebase-workspace?
>
> Thanks
>
> ( PS: Been having mail problems all day so I hope this does not get sent
> twice )
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:07:48 -0800
> From: Aaron J. Seigo
> Reply-To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
> To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
>
> On February 14, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
> > Who would I talk to, to get it moved to kdebase-workspace? I don't want
> > to move it in SVN and then get told off by the build team :)
>
> more the release team. the build is easy :)
>
> maybe ask on kde-packagers@ and release-team@; otherwise, as one of the
> occupants of workspace i'd welcome kinfocenter there. personally i think
> it's
> the kind of app that makes sense as part of the workspace.
>
>
No objections from me.
Seems like a fine idea.
-Allen
From sebas at kde.org Tue Feb 16 09:21:06 2010
From: sebas at kde.org (Sebastian =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCgler?=)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:21:06 +0100
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
In-Reply-To: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com>
References: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com>
Message-ID: <201002160921.29443.sebas@kde.org>
Am Dienstag 16 Februar 2010 04:31:32 schrieb David Hubner:
> Just forwarding a discussion to the release-team mailing list. Is it
> possible to move KInfoCenter to kdebase-workspace?
>
> Thanks
>
> ( PS: Been having mail problems all day so I hope this does not get sent
> twice )
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:07:48 -0800
> From: Aaron J. Seigo
> Reply-To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
> To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
>
> On February 14, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
> > Who would I talk to, to get it moved to kdebase-workspace? I don't want
> > to move it in SVN and then get told off by the build team :)
>
> more the release team. the build is easy :)
>
> maybe ask on kde-packagers@ and release-team@; otherwise, as one of the
> occupants of workspace i'd welcome kinfocenter there. personally i think
> it's
> the kind of app that makes sense as part of the workspace.
I think so, too. I do notice workspace becoming rather large, though. The wallpaper
package (which has been split out by Kubuntu) is 60MB alone.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20100216/334b410e/attachment.sig
From toma at kde.org Tue Feb 16 21:39:22 2010
From: toma at kde.org (Tom Albers)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:39:22 +0100
Subject: kdereview maintainership
In-Reply-To: <200907231604.07711.aseigo@kde.org>
Message-ID: <1464041.SHII8HfyCc@kde.org>
Op Friday 24 July 2009 00:04 schreef u:
> On Thursday 23 July 2009, Tom Albers wrote:
> > In any case preventing kdereview becomes a dumping ground. Which will
> > happen without maintainer. So, another fun job up for taking.
>
> i watch over kdereview/plasma already and plasma-related stuff that goes in
> there.... having another person to help with the rest of the stuff would be
> great, but i'm willing to spend a bit more time in kdereview. it's already
> part of my weekly workflow as it is.
>
Aaron,
Can you update: http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Release_Team ?
Best,
Toma
--
KDE Developer
From hubnerd at ntlworld.com Tue Feb 16 23:13:00 2010
From: hubnerd at ntlworld.com (David Hubner)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:13:00 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
In-Reply-To: <201002160729.43688.winter@kde.org>
References: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com> <201002160729.43688.winter@kde.org>
Message-ID: <4B7B186C.6050604@ntlworld.com>
On 16/02/2010 12:29, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 10:31:32 pm David Hubner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just forwarding a discussion to the release-team mailing list. Is it
>> possible to move KInfoCenter to kdebase-workspace?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ( PS: Been having mail problems all day so I hope this does not get sent
>> twice )
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
>> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:07:48 -0800
>> From: Aaron J. Seigo
>> Reply-To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
>> To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
>>
>> On February 14, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
>>> Who would I talk to, to get it moved to kdebase-workspace? I don't want
>>> to move it in SVN and then get told off by the build team :)
>>
>> more the release team. the build is easy :)
>>
>> maybe ask on kde-packagers@ and release-team@; otherwise, as one of the
>> occupants of workspace i'd welcome kinfocenter there. personally i think
>> it's
>> the kind of app that makes sense as part of the workspace.
>>
>>
> No objections from me.
> Seems like a fine idea.
>
> -Allen
>
As its all good, can someone from the release team move KInfoCenter into
kdebase-workspace as I not completely confident in my SVN abilities when
it comes to moving stuff around. :)
Being my first month of maintaining stuff for KDE I am trying to avoid
breaking it :)
Thanks
David Hubner
From toma at kde.org Tue Feb 16 23:23:35 2010
From: toma at kde.org (Tom Albers)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:23:35 +0100
Subject: Fwd: Am I the only person that ever checks sha1sums? :)
In-Reply-To: <201002151608.31098.mpyne@kde.org>
Message-ID: <3728012.x6eZPF9oBC@kde.org>
Both are fixed now.
Best,
Toma
Op Monday 15 February 2010 22:08 schreef u:
> Release Team,
>
> Apparently SHA1 sums are wrong on some of the tarballs? (See below)
>
> Regards,
> - Michael Pyne
> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>
> Subject: Am I the only person that ever checks sha1sums? :)
> Date: Monday 15 February 2010, 14:54:53
> From: Charles Johnston
> To: kde-devel at kde.org
>
> The two files:
>
> kdebase-4.4.0.tar.bz2
>
> and
>
> oxygen-icons-4.3.5.tar.bz2
>
> do not match the sha1sums that are listed for them.
> Either the sums or the files are messed up.
>
> Any idea why? Did they get re-rolled and somebody forget
> to update the sums?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Charles Johnston
> charles at infoplatter.com
>
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe
> <<
>
> -----------------------------------------
Toma
--
KDE Developer
From aseigo at kde.org Wed Feb 17 00:36:57 2010
From: aseigo at kde.org (Aaron J. Seigo)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:36:57 -0800
Subject: kdereview maintainership
In-Reply-To: <1464041.SHII8HfyCc@kde.org>
References: <1464041.SHII8HfyCc@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002161536.59447.aseigo@kde.org>
On February 16, 2010, Tom Albers wrote:
> Op Friday 24 July 2009 00:04 schreef u:
> > On Thursday 23 July 2009, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > In any case preventing kdereview becomes a dumping ground. Which will
> > > happen without maintainer. So, another fun job up for taking.
> >
> > i watch over kdereview/plasma already and plasma-related stuff that goes
> > in there.... having another person to help with the rest of the stuff
> > would be great, but i'm willing to spend a bit more time in kdereview.
> > it's already part of my weekly workflow as it is.
>
> Aaron,
>
> Can you update: http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Release_Team ?
done :)
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
From aseigo at kde.org Wed Feb 17 00:38:09 2010
From: aseigo at kde.org (Aaron J. Seigo)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:38:09 -0800
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
In-Reply-To: <4B7B186C.6050604@ntlworld.com>
References: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com> <201002160729.43688.winter@kde.org>
<4B7B186C.6050604@ntlworld.com>
Message-ID: <201002161538.10043.aseigo@kde.org>
On February 16, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
> As its all good, can someone from the release team move KInfoCenter into
> kdebase-workspace as I not completely confident in my SVN abilities when
> it comes to moving stuff around. :)
i'll do this today for you :)
> Being my first month of maintaining stuff for KDE I am trying to avoid
> breaking it :)
pfft, where's your sense of adventure? ;P
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
From aseigo at kde.org Wed Feb 17 03:09:56 2010
From: aseigo at kde.org (Aaron J. Seigo)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:09:56 -0800
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
In-Reply-To: <201002161538.10043.aseigo@kde.org>
References: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com> <4B7B186C.6050604@ntlworld.com>
<201002161538.10043.aseigo@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002161809.57761.aseigo@kde.org>
On February 16, 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On February 16, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
> > As its all good, can someone from the release team move KInfoCenter into
> > kdebase-workspace as I not completely confident in my SVN abilities when
> > it comes to moving stuff around. :)
>
> i'll do this today for you :)
ok, done, and hopefully even in a way that the localization teams won't be
searching for me with a baseball bat ;)
cheers ...
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
From hubnerd at ntlworld.com Wed Feb 17 09:30:44 2010
From: hubnerd at ntlworld.com (David Hubner)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:30:44 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
In-Reply-To: <201002161538.10043.aseigo@kde.org>
References: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com>
<201002160729.43688.winter@kde.org> <4B7B186C.6050604@ntlworld.com>
<201002161538.10043.aseigo@kde.org>
Message-ID: <4B7BA934.6020107@ntlworld.com>
On 16/02/2010 23:38, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On February 16, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
>> As its all good, can someone from the release team move KInfoCenter into
>> kdebase-workspace as I not completely confident in my SVN abilities when
>> it comes to moving stuff around. :)
>
> i'll do this today for you :)
>
Thanks, I am going to write some proposals today and submit them to
kde-core-devel it get input.
>> Being my first month of maintaining stuff for KDE I am trying to avoid
>> breaking it :)
>
> pfft, where's your sense of adventure? ;P
>
Most of my friends use KDE and they are bigger than me :)
Thanks
David Hubner
From hubnerd at ntlworld.com Wed Feb 17 09:31:49 2010
From: hubnerd at ntlworld.com (David Hubner)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:31:49 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
In-Reply-To: <201002161538.10043.aseigo@kde.org>
References: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com>
<201002160729.43688.winter@kde.org> <4B7B186C.6050604@ntlworld.com>
<201002161538.10043.aseigo@kde.org>
Message-ID: <4B7BA975.1090207@ntlworld.com>
On 16/02/2010 23:38, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On February 16, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
>> As its all good, can someone from the release team move KInfoCenter into
>> kdebase-workspace as I not completely confident in my SVN abilities when
>> it comes to moving stuff around. :)
>
> i'll do this today for you :)
>
Thanks, I am going to write some proposals today and submit them to
kde-core-devel so I can get some input.
>> Being my first month of maintaining stuff for KDE I am trying to avoid
>> breaking it :)
>
> pfft, where's your sense of adventure? ;P
>
Most of my friends use KDE and they are bigger than me :)
Thanks
David Hubner
From hubnerd at ntlworld.com Wed Feb 17 09:34:00 2010
From: hubnerd at ntlworld.com (David Hubner)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:34:00 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
In-Reply-To: <4B7BA934.6020107@ntlworld.com>
References: <4B7A1194.3040205@ntlworld.com> <201002160729.43688.winter@kde.org> <4B7B186C.6050604@ntlworld.com> <201002161538.10043.aseigo@kde.org>
<4B7BA934.6020107@ntlworld.com>
Message-ID: <4B7BA9F8.10503@ntlworld.com>
On 17/02/2010 08:30, David Hubner wrote:
> On 16/02/2010 23:38, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> On February 16, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
>>> As its all good, can someone from the release team move KInfoCenter into
>>> kdebase-workspace as I not completely confident in my SVN abilities when
>>> it comes to moving stuff around. :)
>>
>> i'll do this today for you :)
>>
>
> Thanks, I am going to write some proposals today and submit them to
> kde-core-devel it get input.
>
>>> Being my first month of maintaining stuff for KDE I am trying to avoid
>>> breaking it :)
>>
>> pfft, where's your sense of adventure? ;P
>>
>
> Most of my friends use KDE and they are bigger than me :)
>
> Thanks
> David Hubner
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
>
Dammit did not click cancel fast enough, nothing to see here but bad
spelling in the morning.. move along! :)
Thanks
David Hubner
From neversfelde at kubuntu.org Thu Feb 18 00:12:22 2010
From: neversfelde at kubuntu.org (Christian Mangold)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:12:22 +0100
Subject: kmldonkey version problem
Message-ID: <201002180012.30885.neversfelde@kubuntu.org>
Hello,
in the kmldonkey about dialog it says it is version 2.0.5, but on ktown there
is 2.0.2. So something is wrong here and as advised in #kde-devel, I post it
to this list.
Regards Christian
--
neversfelde at jabber.neversfelde.de
neversfelde on irc.freenode.net
http://launchpad.net/~neversfelde
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20100218/2d08f057/attachment.sig
From hubnerd at ntlworld.com Mon Feb 15 19:03:05 2010
From: hubnerd at ntlworld.com (David Hubner)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:03:05 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
Message-ID: <4B798C59.4030700@ntlworld.com>
Hi,
Just forwarding a discussion to the release-team mailing list. Is it
possible to move KInfoCenter to kdebase-workspace?
Thanks
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Dependencies on Solid::Control
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:07:48 -0800
From: Aaron J. Seigo
Reply-To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
On February 14, 2010, David Hubner wrote:
> Who would I talk to, to get it moved to kdebase-workspace? I don't want
> to move it in SVN and then get told off by the build team :)
more the release team. the build is easy :)
maybe ask on kde-packagers@ and release-team@; otherwise, as one of the
occupants of workspace i'd welcome kinfocenter there. personally i think
it's
the kind of app that makes sense as part of the workspace.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
From andresbajotierra at gmail.com Mon Feb 15 21:45:04 2010
From: andresbajotierra at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?B?RGFy7W8gQW5kculz?=)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:45:04 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Am I the only person that ever checks sha1sums? :)
In-Reply-To: <4B79A68D.7030904@infoplatter.com>
References: <4B79A68D.7030904@infoplatter.com>
Message-ID:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Charles Johnston
Date: Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:54 PM
Subject: Am I the only person that ever checks sha1sums? :)
To: kde-devel at kde.org
The two files:
kdebase-4.4.0.tar.bz2
and
oxygen-icons-4.3.5.tar.bz2
do not match the sha1sums that are listed for them.
Either the sums or the files are messed up.
Any idea why? ?Did they get re-rolled and somebody forget
to update the sums?
Thanks
Charles Johnston
charles at infoplatter.com
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
From toma at kde.org Thu Feb 18 20:43:02 2010
From: toma at kde.org (Tom Albers)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:43:02 +0100
Subject: kmldonkey version problem
In-Reply-To: <201002180012.30885.neversfelde@kubuntu.org>
Message-ID: <1552092.D0DYfHjCRj@kde.org>
Dear KMLDonkey devels,
We received below message. You probably have done a 2.0.5 release your self and have not updated the createtarball script. In that script 2.0.2 is indicated as the current version number.
If you are making your own releases, do you want to stop us making them? If so please turn of the kde_release=yes bit to no in that same config.
Let us know.
Best,
Toma
KDE Release Team Member.
Op Thursday 18 February 2010 00:12 schreef u:
> Hello,
>
> in the kmldonkey about dialog it says it is version 2.0.5, but on ktown there
> is 2.0.2. So something is wrong here and as advised in #kde-devel, I post it
> to this list.
>
> Regards Christian
>
From toma at kde.org Fri Feb 19 01:29:14 2010
From: toma at kde.org (Tom Albers)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:29:14 +0100
Subject: kmldonkey version problem
In-Reply-To: <201002190125.12745.gmazzurco89@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2658995.NRx48fBzlc@kde.org>
Op Friday 19 February 2010 01:25 schreef u:
> >If you are making your own releases, do you want to stop us making them?
> No we aren't doing release by us own, i think some error occurred in numbering
> of version, please continue to manage release and tell me how to fix this
> numbering issue
Hi,
Thanks for your mail. Please update trunk/KDE/kdesdk/scripts/createtarball/config.ini to reflect the correct version number in that case.
Best,
Toma
--
KDE Developer
From neversfelde at kubuntu.org Fri Feb 19 02:22:04 2010
From: neversfelde at kubuntu.org (Christian Mangold)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:22:04 +0100
Subject: kmldonkey version problem
In-Reply-To: <201002190156.50232.gmazzurco89@gmail.com>
References: <2658995.NRx48fBzlc@kde.org>
<201002190156.50232.gmazzurco89@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201002190222.16179.neversfelde@kubuntu.org>
Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2010 01:56:50 schrieben Sie:
> fixed thanks ;)
So which is the correct version for this cycle? 2.0.2 or 2.0.5?
Kubuntu has 4:2.0.3-kde4.4.0really2.0.2-kde4.4.0-0ubuntu1, which is a bit too
long :).
Regards Christian
--
neversfelde at jabber.neversfelde.de
neversfelde on irc.freenode.net
http://launchpad.net/~neversfelde
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20100219/32d2d346/attachment.sig
From toma at kde.org Fri Feb 19 10:06:08 2010
From: toma at kde.org (Tom Albers)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:06:08 +0100
Subject: kmldonkey version problem
In-Reply-To: <201002190222.16179.neversfelde@kubuntu.org>
Message-ID: <2686726.fSdjeBohA5@kde.org>
Op Friday 19 February 2010 02:22 schreef u:
> Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2010 01:56:50 schrieben Sie:
> > fixed thanks ;)
>
> So which is the correct version for this cycle? 2.0.2 or 2.0.5?
> Kubuntu has 4:2.0.3-kde4.4.0really2.0.2-kde4.4.0-0ubuntu1, which is a bit too
> long :).
At KDE SC 4.4.1 which will appear in two weeks or so, we will ship 2.0.5.
I don't care much how ubuntu calls it, I assume that will be fixed to after this change.
Toma
--
KDE Developer
From gmazzurco89 at gmail.com Fri Feb 19 01:25:12 2010
From: gmazzurco89 at gmail.com (Gioacchino)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:25:12 +0100
Subject: kmldonkey version problem
In-Reply-To: <1552092.D0DYfHjCRj@kde.org>
References: <1552092.D0DYfHjCRj@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002190125.12745.gmazzurco89@gmail.com>
>If you are making your own releases, do you want to stop us making them?
No we aren't doing release by us own, i think some error occurred in numbering
of version, please continue to manage release and tell me how to fix this
numbering issue
very thanks!
On Thursday 18 February 2010 20:43:02 Tom Albers wrote:
> Dear KMLDonkey devels,
>
> We received below message. You probably have done a 2.0.5 release your self
> and have not updated the createtarball script. In that script 2.0.2 is
> indicated as the current version number.
>
> If you are making your own releases, do you want to stop us making them? If
> so please turn of the kde_release=yes bit to no in that same config.
>
> Let us know.
>
> Best,
>
> Toma
> KDE Release Team Member.
>
> Op Thursday 18 February 2010 00:12 schreef u:
> > Hello,
> >
> > in the kmldonkey about dialog it says it is version 2.0.5, but on ktown
> > there is 2.0.2. So something is wrong here and as advised in #kde-devel,
> > I post it to this list.
> >
> > Regards Christian
From gmazzurco89 at gmail.com Fri Feb 19 01:56:50 2010
From: gmazzurco89 at gmail.com (Gioacchino)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:56:50 +0100
Subject: kmldonkey version problem
In-Reply-To: <2658995.NRx48fBzlc@kde.org>
References: <2658995.NRx48fBzlc@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002190156.50232.gmazzurco89@gmail.com>
fixed thanks ;)
On Friday 19 February 2010 01:29:14 Tom Albers wrote:
> Op Friday 19 February 2010 01:25 schreef u:
> > >If you are making your own releases, do you want to stop us making them?
> >
> > No we aren't doing release by us own, i think some error occurred in
> > numbering of version, please continue to manage release and tell me how
> > to fix this numbering issue
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your mail. Please update
> trunk/KDE/kdesdk/scripts/createtarball/config.ini to reflect the correct
> version number in that case.
>
> Best,
>
> Toma
From mueller at kde.org Sat Feb 20 17:48:10 2010
From: mueller at kde.org (Dirk Mueller)
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:48:10 +0100
Subject: KDE 4.4.1 tagging
Message-ID: <201002201748.10248.mueller@kde.org>
Hi,
how about Feb 25th for tagging KDE 4.4.1 and March 2nd for 4.4.1 release? Does
this match expectations?
Greetings,
Dirk
From winter at kde.org Sun Feb 21 13:51:04 2010
From: winter at kde.org (Allen Winter)
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:51:04 -0500
Subject: KDE 4.4.1 tagging
In-Reply-To: <201002201748.10248.mueller@kde.org>
References: <201002201748.10248.mueller@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002210751.04772.winter@kde.org>
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:48:10 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> how about Feb 25th for tagging KDE 4.4.1 and March 2nd for 4.4.1 release? Does
> this match expectations?
>
Yes. I added these dates to the 4.4 Schedule [1] and also added dates
for the 4.4.2 and 4.4.3 releases. As follows:
February 25th, 2010: Tag KDE 4.4.1
March 2nd, 2010: Release KDE 4.4.1
March 25th, 2010: Tag KDE 4.4.2
March 30th, 2010: Release KDE 4.4.2
April 29th, 2010: Tag KDE 4.4.3
May 4th, 2010: Release KDE 4.4.3
[1]
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.4_Release_Schedule
From mueller at kde.org Mon Feb 22 17:38:36 2010
From: mueller at kde.org (Dirk Mueller)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:38:36 +0100
Subject: KDE 4.4.1 tagging
In-Reply-To: <201002210751.04772.winter@kde.org>
References: <201002201748.10248.mueller@kde.org>
<201002210751.04772.winter@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002221738.37029.mueller@kde.org>
On Sunday 21 February 2010, Allen Winter wrote:
> Yes. I added these dates to the 4.4 Schedule [1] and also added dates
> for the 4.4.2 and 4.4.3 releases. As follows:
Great, thank you!
Greetings,
Dirk
From wstephenson at kde.org Wed Feb 24 12:05:03 2010
From: wstephenson at kde.org (Will Stephenson)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:05:03 +0100
Subject: 4.5 schedule on Techbase?
Message-ID: <201002241205.03837.wstephenson@kde.org>
Hi team
Is there a 4.5 schedule that can be published on Techbase? People here at
SUSE are asking me.
Will
From sebas at kde.org Wed Feb 24 12:25:15 2010
From: sebas at kde.org (Sebastian =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCgler?=)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:25:15 +0100
Subject: 4.5 schedule on Techbase?
In-Reply-To: <201002241205.03837.wstephenson@kde.org>
References: <201002241205.03837.wstephenson@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002241225.15444.sebas@kde.org>
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:05:03 Will Stephenson wrote:
> Is there a 4.5 schedule that can be published on Techbase? People here at
> SUSE are asking me.
We haven't discussed exact dates yet, but assuming we stick to the 6 months schedule
(and I think we should), it will be end of July.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20100224/c8f08d0c/attachment.sig
From toma at kde.org Wed Feb 24 12:32:24 2010
From: toma at kde.org (Tom Albers)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:32:24 +0100
Subject: 4.5 schedule on Techbase?
In-Reply-To: <201002241205.03837.wstephenson@kde.org>
Message-ID: <3492952.BUmIsVbFMT@kde.org>
Op Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:05 schreef u:
> Hi team
>
> Is there a 4.5 schedule that can be published on Techbase? People here at
> SUSE are asking me.
>
> Will
Roughly look at 4.4 and add 6 months. I hope I find a minute this week to make the detailled schedule. I've very limited time the next 3-4 weeks.
Any special wishes let me know!
Toma
From mueller at kde.org Wed Feb 24 22:37:04 2010
From: mueller at kde.org (Dirk Mueller)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:37:04 +0100
Subject: Contacting the release coordinators re: critical security vuln
In-Reply-To: <4B78F5EB.1000802@kde.org>
References: <4B78F5EB.1000802@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002242237.04556.mueller@kde.org>
On Monday 15 February 2010, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> However, the security policy says to contact the release coordinators in
> the event of a situation where an immediate fix is necessary. I'm not
> sure whether this is simply so one of you guys can put it out on
> kde-announce or whether it's because we're supposed to roll new, patched
> tarballs.
Hi Jeff,
thanks. I think its fine for this fix to wait for 4.4.1, which is tagged on
friday.
Greetings,
Dirk
From apaku at gmx.de Thu Feb 25 21:33:30 2010
From: apaku at gmx.de (Andreas Pakulat)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:33:30 +0100
Subject: Where to branch from extragear?
Message-ID: <20100225203330.GA17143@barmbek>
Hi,
I just wrote up the release schedule for KDevelop4.0 and wanted to
include to where we'll branch the release. Unfortunately I can't quite
find the right spot in branches/. So where should a extragear app put
its stable branches?
Andreas
--
You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier.
From aacid at kde.org Thu Feb 25 21:50:06 2010
From: aacid at kde.org (Albert Astals Cid)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:50:06 +0000
Subject: Where to branch from extragear?
In-Reply-To: <20100225203330.GA17143@barmbek>
References: <20100225203330.GA17143@barmbek>
Message-ID: <201002252050.07644.aacid@kde.org>
A Dijous, 25 de febrer de 2010, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> I just wrote up the release schedule for KDevelop4.0 and wanted to
> include to where we'll branch the release. Unfortunately I can't quite
> find the right spot in branches/. So where should a extragear app put
> its stable branches?
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/stable/extragear-kde4/
Albert
>
> Andreas
From apaku at gmx.de Thu Feb 25 22:15:58 2010
From: apaku at gmx.de (Andreas Pakulat)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:15:58 +0100
Subject: Where to branch from extragear?
In-Reply-To: <201002252050.07644.aacid@kde.org>
References: <20100225203330.GA17143@barmbek> <201002252050.07644.aacid@kde.org>
Message-ID: <20100225211558.GA2931@trinity.apaku.dnsalias.org>
On 25.02.10 20:50:06, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dijous, 25 de febrer de 2010, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wrote up the release schedule for KDevelop4.0 and wanted to
> > include to where we'll branch the release. Unfortunately I can't quite
> > find the right spot in branches/. So where should a extragear app put
> > its stable branches?
>
> http://websvn.kde.org/branches/stable/extragear-kde4/
Thanks.
Andreas
--
Today is National Existential Ennui Awareness Day.
From apaku at gmx.de Thu Feb 25 22:16:37 2010
From: apaku at gmx.de (Andreas Pakulat)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:16:37 +0100
Subject: KDevelop4 Release Schedule finalized
Message-ID: <20100225211637.GB2931@trinity.apaku.dnsalias.org>
Hi,
for those interest, we've settled on a final schedule for the 4.0
release of KDevelop4:
http://www.kdevelop.org/mediawiki/index.php/KDevelop_4/4.0_Release_Schedule
Andreas
--
Stay away from hurricanes for a while.
From aacid at kde.org Fri Feb 26 00:51:23 2010
From: aacid at kde.org (Albert Astals Cid)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:51:23 +0000
Subject: About KDE l10n 4.4.1 tagging
Message-ID: <201002252351.25823.aacid@kde.org>
I've tried to run a validation over i18n compilation but my 4.4.x instalattion
is in a worrysome state and have run into some problems with the pt_BR and sk
dirs but couldn't say if it was my fault or their fault. so if at the end it
was not a problem in my side you might have to delete some index.docbook files
in those dirs to make sure it compiles.
Sorry about not being able to tell more.
Albert
From lueck at hube-lueck.de Fri Feb 26 08:19:22 2010
From: lueck at hube-lueck.de (Burkhard =?iso-8859-1?q?L=FCck?=)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:19:22 +0100
Subject: About KDE l10n 4.4.1 tagging
In-Reply-To: <201002252351.25823.aacid@kde.org>
References: <201002252351.25823.aacid@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002260819.23133.lueck@hube-lueck.de>
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 00:51:23 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> I've tried to run a validation over i18n compilation but my 4.4.x
> instalattion is in a worrysome state and have run into some problems with
> the pt_BR and sk dirs but couldn't say if it was my fault or their fault.
> so if at the end it was not a problem in my side you might have to delete
> some index.docbook files in those dirs to make sure it compiles.
>
Fixed them (sk only ONE broken docbook, pt_BR 3 broken docbooks)
Time to switch to language docs autogeneration.
--
Burkhard L?ck
From mueller at kde.org Fri Feb 26 21:21:08 2010
From: mueller at kde.org (Dirk Mueller)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:21:08 +0100
Subject: KDE 4.4.1 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
Message-ID: <201002262121.08730.mueller@kde.org>
Hi,
just finished uploading the 1st set of 4.4.1 tarballs. hopefully nothing went
wrong, I haven't tested them yet. Please let me know of any blocking issues.
kde-l10n tarballs are still generating, later tonight/tomorrow.
Greetings,
Dirk
From apaku at gmx.de Sat Feb 27 18:26:21 2010
From: apaku at gmx.de (Andreas Pakulat)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:26:21 +0100
Subject: How to release an extragear app?
Message-ID: <20100227172621.GC27181@trinity.apaku.dnsalias.org>
Hi,
KDevelop4 is approaching its first stable release from extragear and I'm
not fully sure how the procedure is for an extragear app for this.
In particular how does the whole translation-stuff work? Should we have
a kdevelop-i18n.tar.gz or should it be inside the normal
kdevelop.tar.gz? Where and how do I get the translations and how to
build them? I didn't find any pointers to this on techbase, but would be
happy to contribute them once I know the details.
Besides tagging, tarballing, branching, notifying packagers and writing
a dot-announcement is there anything else I need to take care of?
Andreas
--
Think twice before speaking, but don't say "think think click click".
From hein at kde.org Sat Feb 27 18:51:56 2010
From: hein at kde.org (Eike Hein)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:51:56 +0100
Subject: How to release an extragear app?
In-Reply-To: <20100227172621.GC27181@trinity.apaku.dnsalias.org>
References: <20100227172621.GC27181@trinity.apaku.dnsalias.org>
Message-ID: <4B895BBC.2050507@kde.org>
On 02/27/2010 06:26 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Besides tagging, tarballing, branching, notifying packagers and writing
> a dot-announcement is there anything else I need to take care of?
Here's some mails about this I wrote recently:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-extra-gear&m=124927007024432&w=2
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-extra-gear&m=124928664908058&w=2
The checklist has changed a bit recently, e.g. because
the tarballs are now on download.kde.org which implies
6h or so of mirror syncing before being able to do the
public announcements, and because there are new commu-
nication channels like Facebook that the release is
also announced on, and because of the move to git (now
using a homecooked tool rather than create_tarball atm),
but that's basically it.
> Andreas
--
Best regards,
Eike Hein
From jospoortvliet at gmail.com Sun Feb 28 00:32:00 2010
From: jospoortvliet at gmail.com (Jos Poortvliet)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:32:00 +0100
Subject: How to release an extragear app?
In-Reply-To: <4B895BBC.2050507@kde.org>
References: <20100227172621.GC27181@trinity.apaku.dnsalias.org>
<4B895BBC.2050507@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002280032.01060.jospoortvliet@gmail.com>
On Saturday 27 February 2010 18:51:56 Eike Hein wrote:
> On 02/27/2010 06:26 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Besides tagging, tarballing, branching, notifying packagers and writing
> > a dot-announcement is there anything else I need to take care of?
>
> Here's some mails about this I wrote recently:
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-extra-gear&m=124927007024432&w=2
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-extra-gear&m=124928664908058&w=2
>
> The checklist has changed a bit recently, e.g. because
> the tarballs are now on download.kde.org which implies
> 6h or so of mirror syncing before being able to do the
> public announcements, and because there are new commu-
> nication channels like Facebook that the release is
> also announced on, and because of the move to git (now
> using a homecooked tool rather than create_tarball atm),
> but that's basically it.
>
> > Andreas
Please let the promo team know at least a few days beforehand when the release
will be. If you want us we can try and help you write the announcement (pls
give us a week) and maybe a feature guide (but of course a feature guide would
take more than a week, think more like a month).
We'll also help promote the release to facebook, youtube (if you have video's)
and other channels.
The dot editors also need a heads-up a few days before if you want a timely
release announcement on the dot.
Cheers,
Jos
From Sune at vuorela.dk Sun Feb 28 01:17:04 2010
From: Sune at vuorela.dk (Sune Vuorela)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:17:04 +0100
Subject: KDE 4.4.1 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
In-Reply-To: <201002262121.08730.mueller@kde.org>
References: <201002262121.08730.mueller@kde.org>
Message-ID: <201002280117.07696.Sune@vuorela.dk>
On Friday 26 February 2010 21:21:08 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just finished uploading the 1st set of 4.4.1 tarballs. hopefully nothing
> went wrong, I haven't tested them yet. Please let me know of any blocking
> issues.
Can we get r1096627 and 1096628 put into the tag?
there is a .so file installed into data dir, which is fixed in these two
revisions.
Thanks
/Sune
--
How might I overclock the processor?
The point is that from the file inside Photoshop XP you either should debug a
terminale to a controller, or have to telnet to the URL on the periferic of
the modem to a Ultra SCSI firewall for resetting the jumper.
|
+ 
+