Release dates/nomenclature

[Matt Rogers]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Sep 1, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Allen Winter wrote:

> On Saturday 01 September 2007 11:45:07 am Thomas Zander wrote:
>> On Saturday 01 September 2007 17:30:34 Matt Rogers wrote:
>>> That's no different than what we have now. The problem is that  
>>> people
>>> seem to be too interested in fixing Krazy issues rather than fixing
>>> actual bugs. How do you propose we get them interested in fixing  
>>> real
>>> bugs?
>>
>> Stop running the not-so-interresting krazy tests? ;)
>>
> We can pull the plug on the EBN entirely.
> I don't think that will help get bugs fixed, but at least
> it will reduce the number unneeded re-compiles.
>
> I had no idea Krazy/EBN was doing such so harm to the project.
> That was not the intention.
>
> -Allen

I don't think it does that much harm to the project. In fact, I would  
consider the EBN a good thing. However, it may be a good idea to  
suspend it temporarily. Perhaps the number of recompiles caused by  
people not fixing krazy issues will allow some of us to be more  
productive. It may also spur some of the newer developers to work on  
other things besides fixing Krazy issues, which in the grand scheme  
of things, are less important the closer we get to a freeze. (IMHO)

- --
Matt


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFG2e3+A6Vv5rghv0cRAnTNAJ0eg6w27VymESIEBMvPaNPIesQN6QCghdL2
3oAU7O6giP/QJcgxz7eiQog=
=8B7D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----