<div dir="ltr">Hi<div>As far as i can see, the docbook in git is newer, with more screenshots and more content, i guess <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">Andrea should sync the same docbook to svn using git svn</div>
<div><br clear="all"><div dir="ltr">Regards<div>Rohan Garg</div></div><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Albert Astals Cid <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org">aacid@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi, until yesterday, KDE translators have been translated a doc that was<br>
located at<br>
<a href="http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/doc/rekonq/?pathrev=1169512" target="_blank">http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/doc/rekonq/?pathrev=1169512</a><br>
<br>
Today/Yesterday Laurent removed it citing "moved to gitorious"<br>
<br>
I went to <a href="http://www.gitorious.org/rekonq/mainline/trees/master/docs" target="_blank">http://www.gitorious.org/rekonq/mainline/trees/master/docs</a> and found<br>
another docbook. Hurray for duplication! That i have no idea if it is newer,<br>
older or the same.<br>
<br>
The thing is that currently the KDE l10n workflow does not allow translation<br>
of docbooks not hosted in svn, so with Laurent removal of the doc in<br>
extragear/network, rekonq doc is effectively untranslatable. Not sure it<br>
matters, because if it was older than the docu in gitorious it's not that bad<br>
anyway.<br>
<br>
So yeah, we should fix this.<br>
<br>
Albert<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rekonq mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rekonq@kde.org">rekonq@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>