<div dir="ltr">I tried this out too and im getting about 60 FPS with rekonq ( patched ) and was getting 0-1 FPS earlier :D<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:19 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:benjamin.poulain@nokia.com">benjamin.poulain@nokia.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hi,<br>
<br>
Attached is a patch to enable the graphic system raster by default.<br>
<br>
This graphic system is generally faster than the others, you can quickly check the difference on the tests applications created by Microsoft (e.g.: <a href="http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/01FlyingImages/Default.html" target="_blank">http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/01FlyingImages/Default.html</a> ).<br>
In Qt 4.7, we have improved this graphic system even more, and it should give you very good performance on x86, x86_64 and ARMv7.<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
Benjamin<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
rekonq mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rekonq@kde.org">rekonq@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>