I tought the difference was only in the name, but seeing as the diference is in the functionality I agree that "last closed tabs" is better.<br>About the awesomebar I think that is a complex thing that shouldn't be rushed, in other words, I think we shouldn't do it for 0.3.<br>
I think Elko is right we need a plan of what exactly we want to put in the handbook, so that people can then do some parts of it.<br>Yes we have a wiki, it is at: <a href="http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/rekonq/index.php?title=Main_Page">http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/rekonq/index.php?title=Main_Page</a><br>
I'm very impressed about our release going to so many distros, being a gentoo user I guess I'll work on getting 0.3 in to gentoo's repositories too.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Eelko Berkenpies <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kaboon@gmail.com">kaboon@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Andrea Diamantini <<a href="mailto:adjam7@gmail.com">adjam7@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Friday 09 October 2009 03:07:24 jonas gastal wrote:<br>
>> I think "last visited sites" sounds better.<br>
><br>
> I think I explained badly Lionel's idea.<br>
> He prefers "last closed tabs" instead of "last visited sites" because he said<br>
> last visited sites are just the first 8 entries of the history. So, no useful<br>
> information from there.<br>
> Last closed tabs are last 8 (max) tabs closed, so perhaps it's more<br>
> interesting info. What do you think about?<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>I like the idea, at least it makes more sense than displaying the last<br>
visited sites.<br>
<br>
/*snip*/<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Anyway, please, take in mind I promised kubuntu and opensuse packagers to<br>
> release a stable version before their next release (29/10 and 12/11) because<br>
> this is going to be our first release in their official repos.<br>
<br>
</div>Sweet, Fedora 12 will be released on 2009-11-17. I'll do my best to<br>
have the F12 repo ready for rekonq 0.3, which shouldn't be a problem<br>
looking at the other release dates. :)<br>
<div class="im"><br>
>> What kind of docs do you want to write for 0.3? Handbook?<br>
><br>
> yes<br>
<br>
</div>Have you got a plan for this? I'd be glad to help out where possible.<br>
I guess we'd need to set up a list of items we'd like to cover and<br>
than offer the possibility to "take a chapter" and work it out.<br>
<br>
Is there a wiki yet?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
With kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet,<br>
<br>
Eelko Berkenpies<br>
<a href="http://blog.berkenpies.nl/" target="_blank">http://blog.berkenpies.nl/</a><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
rekonq mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rekonq@kde.org">rekonq@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>