<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Lucida Console'; font-size:10pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On 18 апреля 2009 14:52:56 Andrea Diamantini wrote:<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>> About bookmarks questions, my idea is to refactor rekonq bookmarks system<br>
> in this way:<br>
> - create a separate dir for bookmarks tab (like Arora), not exposing ALL<br>
> bookmarks.<br>
Agreed. Not just separate dir. Side panel should be managed as a plugin.<br>
(Or it's parts). But I'm not good in plugin writing, probably we should<br>
leave side panel as it is, till somebody will rewrite it. As I've mentioned<br>
before without bookmarks side panel browser is unusable for me, and I know<br>
many people who won't use rekonq without it :)<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>> - support KDE bookmarks:/ protocol<br>
> For me the second should be right alternative to bookmarks sidebar.<br>
Why not :) But I probably won't use it.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>> About download class... I'm going to review again your code ;) Perhaps I<br>
> pulled some half works, really cannot think some other...<br>
><br>
> rekonq isn't (and has not) a download manager. It just can (obviously)<br>
> start file downloading. And creating a new instance of download class is<br>
> (for me) the right way of doing so.<br>
> From that KIO::job we can link to (and just do it) to KDE notification<br>
> system, to kget or to every other download manager supporting KDE<br>
> technologies. It's fast, simple and safe. So (again), what's better?<br>
Well as far as I know we didn't change this behaviour. It's working as you described.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Probably I should write about download manager changes:<br>
1. Can't start rekonq after close while active downloads present<br>
(crash of rekonq, downloads will lost) - FIXED;<br>
2. Save to default folder or choose folder to save - ADDED;<br>
3. Download and open file with program (by mimetype)<br>
4. We don't download file to memory and THEN write file to disk anymore. I agree rekonq<br>
isn't download manager and shouldn't be used for downloading huge files, but I don't<br>
like such behaviour. And there is always <span style=" text-decoration: line-through;">fools</span> somebody who will do it.<br>
Something more I've forgot?<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>-- <br>
Best regards,<br>
Domrachev Alexandr.</p></body></html>