[rekonq] Review Request 111521: Adding domain-specific hiding support to the adblocker

Andrea Diamantini adjam7 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 15 19:41:47 UTC 2013


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/#review36004
-----------------------------------------------------------


It truly seems good! Many thanks! Just 2 questions: 
1) how could you time so well things happening (generic hiding in 300-500 ms, domain-specific hiding 30-70µs)?
2) how much this improve app memory footprint? (I mean: we were using just a string for each rule, now we have a string and 2 multihash...)

- Andrea Diamantini


On July 15, 2013, 2:10 p.m., Paul Rohrbach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 15, 2013, 2:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding domain-specific hiding support to the adblocker.
> 
> The domain-specific rules are stored in a QMultiHash, where the key is the domain and the values are the rules for the specified domain. This causes redundancy, because on rule can be applied to more than one domain, but has a really fast look-up time. The code for the generic hiding has not changed and is just relocated.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt c749a69 
>   src/adblock/adblockelementhiding.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/adblock/adblockelementhiding.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/adblock/adblockmanager.h 3d329ad 
>   src/adblock/adblockmanager.cpp 51000a3 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - it hides things
> - it is reasonably fast (generic hiding takes with my configuration 300-500ms, the domain-specific hiding only takes 30-70µs)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul Rohrbach
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20130715/cbcf3560/attachment.html>


More information about the rekonq mailing list