[rekonq] Review Request: Activities support for Rekonq

[Ivan Čukić]

> On Oct. 17, 2012, 12:07 p.m., David Narváez wrote:
> > I'm not sure why am I under the impression that adjam does not use activities. Anyhow, I'll pitch in with a couple observations:
> > 
> > First of all, it is cool to see activities integration in rekonq (I'm sure at least mathieson has been asking for this) and I hope we can get more of this.
> > 
> > On the other hand, the target audience of this review is probably not related to the SLC concept so besides mentioning that you can use the SLC applet, it would be useful to give an overview of what does that do and explain how does that make Rekonq a better browser etc.
> > 
> > Another comment, and this applies to all reviews in the platform, not this one in particular, is the Testing Done. People seem to think it is a yes/no question or answer "Works" or "Compiles". According to ReviewBoard documentation "The Testing Done field describes how this change has been tested [...] This should cover any and all testing scenarios that have been done, in order to help reviewers feel more confident about the stability and design of the change."
> > 
> > Now, my review:
> > 
> > I patched my Rekonq master (btw, you probably want to specify that in the branch field) and was unable to configure Rekonq with my current KActivities version (6.0.0) so I updated KActivities and Nepomuk Core to latest master and was able to compile everything. Is that intended? I see the _OPTIONAL cmake macro used there, but I'm not sure why did it fail - I could test that again if you need me to. After installing the patched Rekonq, I can only report it doesn't break, but I'm not sure how to test if it is doing anything with the resources, is there a sparql query I can throw into, e.g., NepSaK to see this working in the backend?
> > 
> > Thanks.

Kinda expected that people follow planetkde - seemed like other applications' reviewers (okular, gwenview, kate ...) knew about SLC.

Will update the description above.

> I could test that again if you need me to

Can you give me the output?


- Ivan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106912/#review20495
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 16, 2012, 1:38 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106912/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 16, 2012, 1:38 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq and Andrea Diamantini.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Rekonq reports the open/close document events to activity manager daemon.
> Side-effect - support for Share-Like-Connect applet.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 030f0fb 
>   config-kactivities.h.cmake PRE-CREATION 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 6c27376 
>   src/mainview.h 89ee36e 
>   src/mainview.cpp 15e0d5e 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106912/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Yes, with multiple tabs and separate windows
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ivan Čukić
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20121017/61dcbb1c/attachment.html>