[rekonq] Re: Review Request: Fix a conflict between Konqueror and Rekonq for bookmarks

Yoann Laissus yoann.laissus at gmail.com
Wed May 18 09:01:14 CEST 2011



> On May 17, 2011, 9:52 p.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > Looks good! Many thanks for this ;)
> > Please, merge it on master and backport (cherry-pick) it on 0.7 branch. I'll take care of deleting the remote branch created :)

Merged and backported :)


- Yoann


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101368/#review3374
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 15, 2011, 1:10 p.m., Yoann Laissus wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101368/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 15, 2011, 1:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The branch is here : git://anongit.kde.org/clones/rekonq/laissus/rekonq-clone.git rekonqKonquerorBkConflict
> I've made a mistake sorry, please delete this branch in the rekonq repository. I don't have rights to do that.
> 
> - Fix a conflict which prevents konqueror from saving bookmarks when rekonq is launched.
> - Definitely fix the copy of rekonq default bookmarks if the file doesn't exist. (No problem with Konqueror anymore)
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 273134.
>     /show_bug.cgi?id=273134
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/bookmarks/bookmarkprovider.h 4af97ef 
>   src/bookmarks/bookmarkprovider.cpp cef6eae 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101368/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - Tested with a defaultbookmarks.xbel which contains folders and toolbar xml fields
> - Tested with konqueror keditbookmarks and rekonq
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yoann
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20110518/f165373a/attachment.htm 


More information about the rekonq mailing list