<div dir="ltr"><div>The main reason why on <a href="https://zenned.gitlab.io/">Zenned</a> I haven't yet set Wayland as the default session is the following <a href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499256">bug</a>.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 4:41 PM Alberto Salvia Novella <<a href="mailto:es20490446e@gmail.com">es20490446e@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>My feeling is that the schedule shall not be based on a timeline, but rather on when the technology is truly stable.</div><div><br></div><div>Let me make a list of what is lacking right now on Wayland, and I will come back to you shortly.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 11:03 AM Martin Riethmayer <<a href="mailto:ripper@freakmail.de" target="_blank">ripper@freakmail.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Am 15.12.25 um 10:39 schrieb Ben Cooksley:<br>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 10:14 PM Martin Riethmayer <<a href="mailto:ripper@freakmail.de" target="_blank">ripper@freakmail.de</a> <br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ripper@freakmail.de" target="_blank">ripper@freakmail.de</a>>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Martin,<br>
<br>
Hi Ben,<br>
<br>
[...]<br>
<br>
> 6.7.6 2026-10-27<br>
> 6.7.7 2027-01-26<br>
> 6.7.8 2027-06-22<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> This sort of implies that we will have functional CI for the entire way <br>
> through to 6.7.8, which is much easier said than done.<br>
<br>
Just for clarification: Nothing here is set in stone, it's based on my <br>
quick LO Calc sheet and the initial release date wrt to the 4-month <br>
cycle, only. I'm not saying that this is the "best" way to go or that <br>
this "should" be the schedule, it's only one option.<br>
<br>
I'm sort of aware of these CI issues (though not in detail, of course) <br>
which is why I wanted to kick off a discussion on that schedule "early".<br>
<br>
[...]<br>
<br>
>> <br>
>> - I have not taken into consideration any release schedules of<br>
>> distributions<br>
>> <br>
> <br>
> Given this is essentially planned to be an LTS release (given the <br>
> support out to mid-2027) that is quite relevant here I'd say.<br>
<br>
I see the argument for this. Are there any distro maintainers on this <br>
list, other than Rik Mills that could voice an opinion? Or is there a <br>
better place to ask for distribution wishes wrt the schedule?<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>