<table><tr><td style="">ngraham added a comment.
</td><a style="text-decoration: none; padding: 4px 8px; margin: 0 8px 8px; float: right; color: #464C5C; font-weight: bold; border-radius: 3px; background-color: #F7F7F9; background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom,#fff,#f1f0f1); display: inline-block; border: 1px solid rgba(71,87,120,.2);" href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D28218">View Revision</a></tr></table><br /><div><div><p>Hmm, this seems like the kind of nerdy exposing-implementation-details thing that would be problematic from a UX standpoint. I can see the use cases for wanting to open a read-only file read-write so you can actually save to it, but I think a better UX for this might be to ask the user right at the point of use, rather than putting a custom checkbox in the dialog.</p>
<p>And what's the use case for wanting to open a read-write file read-only?</p></div></div><br /><div><strong>REPOSITORY</strong><div><div>R838 Flatpak Support: KDE Portal for XDG Desktop</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>REVISION DETAIL</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D28218">https://phabricator.kde.org/D28218</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>To: </strong>jgrulich, Plasma<br /><strong>Cc: </strong>ngraham, apol, plasma-devel, Orage, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, ahiemstra, mart<br /></div>