<table><tr><td style="">sitter added inline comments.
</td><a style="text-decoration: none; padding: 4px 8px; margin: 0 8px 8px; float: right; color: #464C5C; font-weight: bold; border-radius: 3px; background-color: #F7F7F9; background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom,#fff,#f1f0f1); display: inline-block; border: 1px solid rgba(71,87,120,.2);" href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D27935">View Revision</a></tr></table><br /><div><strong>INLINE COMMENTS</strong><div><div style="margin: 6px 0 12px 0;"><div style="border: 1px solid #C7CCD9; border-radius: 3px;"><div style="padding: 0; background: #F7F7F7; border-color: #e3e4e8; border-style: solid; border-width: 0 0 1px 0; margin: 0;"><div style="color: #74777d; background: #eff2f4; padding: 6px 8px; overflow: hidden;"><a style="float: right; text-decoration: none;" href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D27935#inline-159127">View Inline</a><span style="color: #4b4d51; font-weight: bold;">aacid</span> wrote in <span style="color: #4b4d51; font-weight: bold;">pam_kwallet.c:329</span></div>
<div style="margin: 8px 0; padding: 0 12px; color: #74777D;"><blockquote style="border-left: 3px solid #a7b5bf; color: #464c5c; font-style: italic; margin: 4px 0 12px 0; padding: 4px 12px; background-color: #f8f9fc;"><p style="padding: 0; margin: 8px;">How about leaving it in for 5.18 and drop it for master?<br />
Should there be an unexpected problem we'll at least have months of theoretical testing and a shorter window from 5.19.0 to .1 to hotfix a > potential regression.</p></blockquote>
<p style="padding: 0; margin: 8px;">Doesn't sound very convincing to me, if there's going to be a regression i'd prefer it to be this month when i still remember this code and i still use kwallet-pam and pam_fscrypt, if you delay it to 5.19.0 or something I will not totally remember this code and may not be using this any of those two either os my motivation to fix it may be pretty small.</p>
<p style="padding: 0; margin: 8px;">I can try adding the code that makes pam_sm_open_session from here if you think it makes sense to have it</p></div></div>
<div style="margin: 8px 0; padding: 0 12px;"><p style="padding: 0; margin: 8px;">That is a fair point but I for one cannot +1 this diff as-is. So, I would prefer the pam_sm_open_session call making a return.</p>
<p style="padding: 0; margin: 8px;">Or someone else gives a +1, I don't profoundly object to the diff, but it is in my mind not suitable for a stable release right now:<br />
Currently in 5.18 one can call session before auth and it works. With this diff that'd be no longer the case and a behavioral change in a stable release update. I have no idea if that has real life implications but I can totally imagine one of our enterprise users pulling weird stuff like that.</p></div></div></div></div></div><br /><div><strong>REPOSITORY</strong><div><div>R107 KWallet PAM Integration</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>REVISION DETAIL</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D27935">https://phabricator.kde.org/D27935</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>To: </strong>aacid<br /><strong>Cc: </strong>sitter, security-team, davidedmundson, plasma-devel, Orage, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, ngraham, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart<br /></div>