<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Jonathan Riddell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jr@jriddell.org" target="_blank">jr@jriddell.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":xu" class="" style="overflow:hidden">Really this is normal practice.</div></blockquote></div><br>Can you please give me sources for this?<br><br>KDE 4.9 - No errata</div><div class="gmail_extra">KDE 4.10 - No errata</div><div class="gmail_extra">KDE 4.11 - No errata</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">The applications release hasĀ a 'This is a list of grave bugs and common pitfalls surfacing after the release was packaged' [1]. That doesn't seem like an errata.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Just for the record, I'm not against highlighting missing features on the errata. I am, however, very against linking to bugs from 2010, which aren't solvable.<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><span style="color:rgb(192,192,192)">Vishesh Handa</span><br></div><div class="gmail_signature"><span style="color:rgb(192,192,192)"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_signature"><div class="gmail_extra"><br class="">[1] <a href="https://www.kde.org/info/applications-15.03.95.php">https://www.kde.org/info/applications-15.03.95.php</a><br></div><div><br></div></div>
</div></div>