<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2014-11-07 13:05 GMT+01:00 David Edmundson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david@davidedmundson.co.uk" target="_blank">david@davidedmundson.co.uk</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">If it's on bugzilla and marked as confirmed, it means we're going to do it.<div><br></div><div>If it's on bugzilla and marked as invalid/wontfix it means we're not going to do it</div><div><br></div><div>If it's on bugzilla and marked as unconfirmed, then we collectively suck.</div></div></blockquote><div><br><div>hmm, if that’s the case, the widget porters should have filed those when releasing their ports.<br><br></div><div>nobody knows better than them what they left out, and now it’s up to the users to find and report them :/<br><br></div>other
stuff is simply a design question: per-activity settings were something
implemented per individual KCM. are they being centralized or are they
simply gone? people who know such things could post them in e.g.
<a href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340652">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340652</a> to make us suck less. <br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br>2014-11-07 13:24 GMT+01:00 Marco Martin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:notmart@gmail.com" target="_blank">notmart@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">And most important (just as a general reminder even tough that's not the case<br>
now), if is *not* on bugzilla, it's going to be forgotten, so always make<br>
sure to report there the issues (other channels such as irc and mailinglists<br>
do a terrible job at issue tracking)</blockquote><div class="gmail_quote">2014-11-07 13:21 GMT+01:00 Kai Uwe Broulik <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kde@privat.broulik.de" target="_blank">kde@privat.broulik.de</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
first of all, things like these belong directly into <a href="https://bugs.kde.org" target="_blank">https://bugs.kde.org</a> instead of on the ML because here things like that tend to be forgotten under
the pile of mails that arrive daily.</blockquote><div> </div><div><div class="gmail_extra">people, seriously?<br><br>you might notice that i posted a bugzilla link for everything but one item. why do you feel the need to tell <i>me</i> (who obviously has done his homework) that knee-jerk response even if it doesn’t apply to me?<br></div><br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"> Icon-only task manager has no option to open new instances via middle <span class="">click. Shift-click has been just implemented, though</span><br><span class=""></span></blockquote><span class="">
<br>
</span>There's been a bit of discussion about what middle click should to, it has
been agreed iirc that middle click will close the application to be consistent
with all the other tabs (browsers, file manager, ...). Shift+Click will be the new launch new instance shortcut. There's also a bit of investigation going on
to enable keyboard shortcuts such as Meta+1 for the first item in tray, Meta+2
for the second, etc.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>yeah. when i tried it, it wasn’t implemented, so naturally i yearned for the thing i was used to: middle click. shift-click is more consistent, but i use the task bar more often to start new instances than to close them.<br></div><div><br></div><div>well, i’ll have to live with having to use two hands for that now.<br><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">
No simple launcher plasmoid for one application.<span class=""></span><br><span class=""></span></blockquote><span class="">
<br>
</span>There is the icon plasmoid? Just drag an application onto the desktop and it will create a simple single icon for it.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>oh! so intuitive for everyone but people who spent too much time with the taskbar to try new things (this isn’t meant sarcastically, i really like it ☺)<br><br></div><div>i bet i’d have discovered that if it wasn’t KDE but something i don’t use daily<br></div></div><br></div>Best, Philipp<br></div></div>