<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-12 18:05 GMT+08:00 Albert Astals Cid <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org" target="_blank">aacid@kde.org</a>></span>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div class="h5">
> Well, maybe not to drop it in certain range like 65%, but to warn the<br>
> coordinator when under 70%. And when the translation rate is under 70% for<br>
> three consecutive versions (even in 69%) it can be dropped.<br>
<br>
</div></div>The thing is, if we do that, we are punishing "Joe user" that probably can<br>
still use the software at 69%<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Albert<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, I agree with it. But it is also about the community contributions. If </div><div>1. a language is under soft limit for several releases,</div><div>2. a language is warned for several times and announced about to be kicked out from KDE framework, </div>
<div>3. nobody cares about it (therefore nobody is coming out to "save" it) <-- the most important</div><div><br></div><div>does KDE have to keep this language anymore? Even a language is kicked out, if anyone decides to save the language, they can do it any time and the language will be restored in the next release.</div>
<div><br></div><div>zh_TW Traditional Chinese used to be warned once before I become the coordinator... Fortunately there were several people coming out to save zh_TW from being kicked out.</div><div><br></div><div>BTW, maybe in the supported language list we can also list the languages which used to be in KDE Framework but then kicked out due to lack of maintain, so that anyone who cares about the language can know and do something.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Franklin</div></div></div></div>