<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Riddell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jr@jriddell.org" target="_blank">jr@jriddell.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:54:22AM +0200, Vishesh Handa wrote:<br>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Jonathan Riddell <<a href="mailto:jr@jriddell.org">jr@jriddell.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> d58af08286e9d85ea6afa77831692c02efba9ba8ddebf57fd342854062425d39<br>
</div>> A kfilemetadata5-4.98.0.tar.xz<br>
> 24f401be4beda474a386bd223390477ece9ab3329183d0f69b06ccb5859ecbba<br>
<div class="">> A baloo5-4.98.0.tar.xz<br>
><br>
> Why do some tarballs have 5 appended to them? baloo5, kfilemetadata5, and<br>
> milou5? Others seem to be missing the 5.<br>
> Please either add the 5 everywhere or remove it from those 3.<br>
<br>
</div>I renamed baloo's tar to baloo5 because it contains some libraries<br>
which most distros will want to co-install so I'd expect baloo<br>
(kdelibs4) and baloo (kf5) to exist in distro archives together, for<br>
which they need different names. kfilemetadata is similar. milou is<br>
probably a mistake, that won't co-exist.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>A similar case exists for kactivites. It existed in kde4 as well and the current framework has the same name.</div><div><br></div><div>I would really like the tarballs to have the same name. Also, baloo4 and 5 are not really co-installable. They both ship executables with the same name.</div>
</div><div><br></div>-- <br><span style="color:rgb(192,192,192)">Vishesh Handa</span><br>
</div></div>