<div class="gmail_quote">Forgot to mention:<br><br>We've got plans (and all the necessary dependencies and some helper code in svn already) to make a WSDL importer for Jolie (which can also be used dynamically, hence obtaining a "Generic WSDL-declared service").<br>
We already have a working prototype of the opposite (automatic generation of a WSDL file from a Jolie program), but it needs to be code-restyled a little before entering Jolie's trunk.<br><br>So a good option would be to work directly on the Jolie<->WSDL integration, if there's someone willing to code in Java. If such an opportunity arises I offer myself as mentor because I'll need to mentor someone either way, under one scope (GSOC) or another (University/Work/whatever).<br>
<br>2009/2/20 Aaron J. Seigo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aseigo@kde.org">aseigo@kde.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Friday 20 February 2009, Fabrizio Montesi wrote:<br>
> Yo everyone.<br>
> In the GSoC ideas page there's this entry related to Plasma: "Project:<br>
> Generic SOAP Dataengine". That projects overlaps with the work currently<br>
> being done with the integration of Jolie. Does anyone know anything about<br>
> that entry (it's been put anonymously)?<br>
<br>
</div></div>hm, that should probably be "Generic SOAP Service". a dataengine doesn't<br>
really make sense for that use case.</blockquote></div><br>Definitely. ;)<br>