<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Sans Serif'; font-size:10pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">> On Saturday 22 November 2008, Jesse L. Zamora wrote:<br>
> > 1. Why does Plasma slow down so much when you zoom out to see the<br>
> > activities?<br>
><br>
> because it does all the scaling in software. that == slowness.<br>
><br>
> > Is there any way to increase the performance?<br>
><br>
> not doing it software. qt 4.5 is probably when this will be available to<br>
> us<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>I sure hope so! :-) I was getting kinda scared at that slow performance!! :-O<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>><br>
> > 2. Why doesn't it have the capability to just click on the activity you<br>
> > want to zoom in to it? I find that clicking the cashew is somewhat<br>
> > burdensome.<br>
><br>
> clicking on the activity would mean you can't interact with them when<br>
> zoomed out ... that's not what we want. it's a little bit of magic<br>
> behaviour.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>In that case, then why not have the ability to drag widgets between activities? That sounds like a sensible idea! Other wise, dragging widgets around zoomed out (from what I can see) doesn't have much of a purpose.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>><br>
> the plan (for 4.2 even) is to hide the cashew when zoomed and instead show<br>
> a "control bar" beneath each containment with some basic action buttons.<br>
> not unlike the panel controler in that way.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>That sounds pretty sweet.......<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>> > 3. Why is the background the color it is? The transparent<br>
> > checkered box background looks, well, it looks unpolished.<br>
><br>
> it's a simple, fast to paint background that says very clearly "this is<br>
> blank space". it's common in other canvas based apps that users are more<br>
> likely to be famliar with: drawing and painting apps.<br>
><br>
> when it wasn't that checkerboard people would ask what was going on when<br>
> they zoomed out, what happened to the background, etc.<br>
><br>
> so i put clarity over beauty in this case.<br>
><br>
> i've thought about a gradient, but that would be a rather unecessary abuse<br>
> of horsepower imo ... i've though about putting a default wallpaper there<br>
> but that stands a really good chance of making the activities harder to<br>
> see.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>That makes plenty of sense. But still, I wonder if there isn't a more elegant solution.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p><p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p></body></html>