Next Plasma LTS?

[Nicolas Fella]

On 1/10/22 12:51, David Edmundson wrote:
> The last 5.X release definitely needs to be an LTS. That's unmovable.
> We can't have two active LTSs, it'd be a backporting nightmare and at
> best it would be a lie to claim we're actively supporting both.
>
> An LTS now effectively means we can't start Plasma 6 for another year.
> I personally think that's too late we're at a point where some people
> are building certain plasma repos against Qt6 already.
>
> I can envision Plasma 5.25 being the last before branching.

I think that's a bit too early. It also heavily depends on how the KF6
work is going to go where we don't really have a concrete timeline yet.

Cheers

Nico