<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">Ivan Čukić <ivan.cukic@gmail.com> wrote:<br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">> changing the list in any way would be tampering with the results<br></div></div></div></div><br>Tampering with the results? This was directed to you, Ruphy and Nuno who, including myself, <span style="font-style: italic;">created</span> those results. The original intent, as I understood it, was that we <span style="font-style:
italic;">discuss</span> the top rated themes. Given that we couldn't even get the judgement in on time, I focused on supporting getting the results announced on time. Now that we've missed that deadline anyway, I thought I'd share my concerns about Silicon being included. We can argue that I missed my oppurtunity to discuss it, but "tampering"?...<br><br>No matter... My concerns are aired: Silicon doesn't work visually with rotated widgets. Should we include with KDE a theme that doesn't work well with a basic plasma feature?<br><br>I'm fine with the consensus. Absent any input from Ruphy or Nuno, the consensus is the results (which includes Silicon). :-)<br><br>peace,<br>Andrew<span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;"></span></span></span><br></div></div></body></html>