<html>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
<table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 solid;">
<tr>
<td>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
<a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114153/">http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114153/</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<p style="margin-top: 0;">On November 27th, 2013, 7:44 p.m. UTC, <b>Albert Astals Cid</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Don't have an opinion to be honest. It is true that for some cases it looks better, but for some others it looks weird since you switch between text rendered by poppler and text rendered by us. I'm not oposed to either. Fabio?</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">A compromise would be to only use this approach for the geometric shapes (Ink stroke, line, polygon, and ellipse) and keep that past behavior for everything else. The geometric shapes seem to me to be rendered nearly identically in Okular as in Poppler.</pre>
<br />
<p>- Jon</p>
<br />
<p>On November 27th, 2013, 3:22 p.m. UTC, Jon Mease wrote:</p>
<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" style="background-image: url('http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/static/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.ab6f3b1072c9.png'); background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black solid;">
<tr>
<td>
<div>Review request for Okular.</div>
<div>By Jon Mease.</div>
<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated Nov. 27, 2013, 3:22 p.m.</i></p>
<div style="margin-top: 1.5em;">
<b style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt;">Repository: </b>
okular
</div>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Unlike in other document formats, the annotations on PDF documents are rendered by the Poppler back-end along with the document itself. Because this document rendering step is expensive we don't render annotations on PDF documents while the annotations are being moved (With Ctrl+Left click drag). Instead of rendering the annotation itself during the move, we render a dashed outline of the annotation. For non-PDF document types the annotations are rendered by Okular on top of the document, and so there is no large performance penalty in rendering the annotation smoothly as it is moved. I find the aesthetic experience of moving annotations on non-PDF to be much more pleasing.
In this small patch updates the paintCroppedPageOnPainter() function draw external annotations using the internal annotation drawing logic while the annotation is being moved. It also removes the dashed annotation outline during the move. With this small change the experience of moving an annotation on a PDF now matches that of moving an annotation on the other document formats.
Two small oddities: The rendering of the popup note icon differs between the Poppler back-end and Okular's internal rendering so the icon changes form while being moved and then changes back after being dropped. The rendering of fonts on inline notes between the Poppler back-end and Okular's internal rendering seems to differ in some cases so as you move an inline note the font changes.
Thoughts?</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Testing </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Tested drawing and moving each of the annotation types on a PDF document and on a DVI document. The behavior on the DVI document is unchanged. I find the behavior on the PDF document to be more natural.</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">
<li>ui/pagepainter.cpp <span style="color: grey">(d5d9c3e)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114153/diff/" style="margin-left: 3em;">View Diff</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>