D22064: General improvements to stamp annotation

[Nathaniel Graham]

ngraham added a comment.


  If the feature is considered fundamentally broken, then just hiding it behind a bad UI isn't really enough because people will discover it anyway (I did). It either should be totally removed so we don't torture users until Poppler can handle it properly, or it should be branded with a big banner that says "warning, this is an experimental feature. It may not work in X, Y, or Z circumstances." Personally I would prefer the latter.

REPOSITORY
  R223 Okular

BRANCH
  improve-stamp-annotation

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D22064

To: simgunz, #okular, ngraham
Cc: pino, aacid, yurchor, ngraham, okular-devel, maguirre, fbampaloukas, joaonetto, kezik, tfella, darcyshen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/okular-devel/attachments/20190721/e8de3859/attachment-0001.html>