Hey Sebastian<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Sebastian Trüg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:trueg@kde.org">trueg@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi Vishesh,<br>
<br>
(CC'ing nepomuk ML because we should discuss the DMS more open)<br>
<br>
Please have a look at the importgraph[1] branch I just pushed and tell<br>
me if you are fine with that addition. I was not sure if putting the<br>
code in the model directly was the best approach. An alternative would<br>
have been to put the file parsing in the command class. But then only<br>
the DBus interface would have had access to that method...<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Considering all the logic of the Data management service is in the Data Management model, </div><div>it makes sense to have the code over there only.</div>
<div><br></div><div>The code seems fairly straightforward.</div><div> </div><div>Btw, what finally happened about not allowing unknown properties and classes in the DMS?</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Sebastian<br>
<br>
[1]<br>
<a href="http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Ftrueg%2Fnepomuk-datamanagement.git&a=log&h=refs/heads/importgraph" target="_blank">http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Ftrueg%2Fnepomuk-datamanagement.git&a=log&h=refs/heads/importgraph</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><font color="#999999">Vishesh Handa</font><br>
</div>