<div class="gmail_quote">2010/6/21 Sebastian Trüg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:trueg@kde.org">trueg@kde.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
The thing is that I would like the make the facet stuff public API for<br>
KDE 4.6. That is why I am picking on it and being a pita. :P<br>
<div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>:D</div><div>Then I can search a different term for "Term", but "Facet" must retain its name, which is its academia name :)</div><div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">Do you actually want to create different representations for different</div>
types of facets. The only exception I can see is the rating. But that<br>
could easily be filtered out and added as a separate gui element.<br><br></blockquote></div><div><br></div>Well, currently my answer should be "yes" (looking at Sembrowser), but actually is "no": in the Web world, faceted browsing does not use different representations for facets, it uses a uniform one, so in the end I am for uniform representation also here :)<div>
The only thing I am objecting here is that a model should support only one facet (or one facetgroup, following your name), because I really don't know if it makes sense to show more than one facet in the same UI. Even if you use the same representation (say, a listview), then each listview should have its model instance, and each model instance should have one facet, and each facet n terms.<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Sivieri Alessandro<br><a href="mailto:alessandro.sivieri@gmail.com">alessandro.sivieri@gmail.com</a><br><a href="http://www.chimera-bellerofonte.eu/">http://www.chimera-bellerofonte.eu/</a><br><a href="http://www.poul.org/">http://www.poul.org/</a><br>
</div>