<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><p>Only the open !<br></p>
<p>Cheers,<br>
BogDan.</p>
<p>Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android</p>
</td></tr></table> <div id="_origMsg_">
<div style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif:font-size:10pt">
<br />
<div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">
<font size="2" face="Tahoma">
<hr size="1">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span>
</b>
Marco Bernasocchi <marco@bernawebdesign.ch>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold:">To:</span>
</b>
BogDan <bog_dan_ro@yahoo.com>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold:">Cc:</span>
</b>
necessitas-devel@kde.org <necessitas-devel@kde.org>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold:">Subject:</span>
</b>
Re: Necessitas is NOT ... (consolidating infrastructure) <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span>
</b>
Sat, Mar 17, 2012 10:01:45 PM <br>
</font>
<br>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" style="font:inherit;">On 03/17/2012 10:06 PM, BogDan wrote:<BR>> [...]<BR>>>>>> Nobody wanted to do it! I can't do everything by myself !<BR>>>>> I can maybe do some of it, but don't we want to move all to<BR>>>>> <a href="http://community.kde.org/Necessitas" target=_blank >http://community.kde.org/Necessitas</a> and eventually shut down the sf page?<BR>>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> It's up to you ! The problem is that currently the sf.net home page is used by too may users to shut down it immediately, also it has an easier and better bugtracker than KDE and google code, so, IMHO it will be wise to keep them both and to use sf.net page as primary until we get something better, but as I said, in the end is up to you !<BR>>> Ok, then lets stick to SF, and lets try to shut down the other bugtrackers. Kde bt has only 5 bugs and
google has only few more. Is it ok if i duplicate them to SF?<BR>><BR>> Yes, please !!!<BR>Is it enough to copy only the open bugs? or shall I copy all?<BR>><BR>>> As well, can i get edit rights for sf? Im mbernasocchi.<BR>><BR>> Done, please check if you have enough rights !<BR>><BR>looks ok<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> [...]<BR>>>>>> - 1 bug tracker on sourceforge and 1 on google code - it was discuss<BR>>>>>> many times before, ONLY bug tracker on sourceforge should be used.<BR>>>>> We could just hide the issue tracker tab at:<BR>>>>> <a href="http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs" target=_blank >http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs</a><BR>>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> I know that feature, I didn't had enough time to move the remaining bug to sf.net
...<BR>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>> and what about <a href="https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas" target=_blank >https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas</a><BR>>>><BR>>>> I wanted to use it as primary bugtracker, but is too complicated for normal users, so I decide to stick with sf.net until we find a better solution.<BR>>>><BR>>>> [...]<BR>>>>>> - The ONLY solution was to "force" contributors to release their<BR>>>>> code<BR>>>>>> under BSD or public domain.<BR>>>>> So you are saying that using reviewboard is the way to force contributors to<BR>>>>> "BSD or public domain" their code so it is "legally"<BR>>>>> impossible to use pull reguests from gitourious?<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> Sadly, it is legally impossible!. Otherwise we
can't upstream it !<BR>>>><BR>>>> I'll try again to convince qt-project to host android qt port on their servers, this way all these problems will disappear. I hope this time to have more success.<BR>>> Super<BR>>>><BR>>>> Cheers,<BR>>>> BogDan.<BR>>> Ciao<BR>>><BR>>> On Mar 17, 2012 9:41 PM, "BogDan"<<a ymailto="mailto:bog_dan_ro@yahoo.com" href="javascript:return">bog_dan_ro@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<BR>>><BR>>> Hi,<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> [...]<BR>>>>>> Nobody wanted to do it! I can't do everything by myself !<BR>>>>> I can maybe do some of it, but don't we want to move all to<BR>>>>> <a href="http://community.kde.org/Necessitas" target=_blank >http://community.kde.org/Necessitas</a> and eventually shut down the sf page?<BR>>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> It's
up to you ! The problem is that currently the sf.net home page is used by too may users to shut down it immediately, also it has an easier and better bugtracker than KDE and google code, so, IMHO it will be wise to keep them both and to use sf.net page as primary until we get something better, but as I said, in the end is up to you !<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> [...]<BR>>>>>> - 1 bug tracker on sourceforge and 1 on google code - it was discuss<BR>>>>>> many times before, ONLY bug tracker on sourceforge should be used.<BR>>>>> We could just hide the issue tracker tab at:<BR>>>>> <a href="http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs" target=_blank >http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs</a><BR>>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> I know that feature, I didn't had enough time to move the remaining bug to sf.net
...<BR>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>> and what about <a href="https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas" target=_blank >https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas</a><BR>>>><BR>>>> I wanted to use it as primary bugtracker, but is too complicated for normal users, so I decide to stick with sf.net until we find a better solution.<BR>>>><BR>>>> [...]<BR>>>>>> - The ONLY solution was to "force" contributors to release their<BR>>>>> code<BR>>>>>> under BSD or public domain.<BR>>>>> So you are saying that using reviewboard is the way to force contributors to<BR>>>>> "BSD or public domain" their code so it is "legally"<BR>>>>> impossible to use pull reguests from gitourious?<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> Sadly, it is legally impossible!. Otherwise we
can't upstream it !<BR>>>><BR>>>> I'll try again to convince qt-project to host android qt port on their servers, this way all these problems will disappear. I hope this time to have more success.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Cheers,<BR>>>> BogDan.<BR>>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Marco Bernasocchi<BR>www.opengis.ch<BR></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>