<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Dear all,<div class="">I am a little bit concerned that the introduction of StellarSolver is not smooth enough. Please don’t get me wrong, I fully appreciate all the work behind and the intention is perfectly fine.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">But a user not familiar with all the discussion behind might be confused with the new UI. When I opened the new Align tab I was surprised that my only choice is StellarSolver and it looked like <a href="http://astrometry.net" class="">astrometry.net</a> is no longer supported - and I was aware that there was work ongoing behind introducing a new framework.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I then discovered that I could go back to my old <a href="http://astrometry.net" class="">astrometry.net</a> solution - but still I am not sure which are the right options so that it simply works as before.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">We should be aware that we have a substantial amount of users that use nightly builds or even build from source on their own. And some of them will discover the new setup late in the evening shortly before the photography session starts.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I personally would really appreciate if the old setup with <a href="http://astrometry.net" class="">astrometry.net</a> and ASTAP remains as an option directly on the Align tab and we leave us more time for the transition.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Does that make sense to you?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Cheers</div><div class="">Wolfgang<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Am 05.10.2020 um 12:55 schrieb Jasem Mutlaq <<a href="mailto:mutlaqja@ikarustech.com" class="">mutlaqja@ikarustech.com</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">I concur! The documentation needs to be updated. I don't think there is time _before_ 3.5.0 is released fully, but hopefully close to the release date. <div class=""><br class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div dir="rtl" class=""><br clear="all" class=""></div><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">--</div><div class="">Best Regards,<br class="">Jasem Mutlaq<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></div></div></div><br class=""></div></div></div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:03 AM Hy Murveit <<a href="mailto:murveit@gmail.com" class="">murveit@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class="">Another thing re 3.5.0.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I propose we get the kstars manual in better shape--review the major sections and make sure they're up to date.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://docs.kde.org/trunk5/en/extragear-edu/kstars/index.html" target="_blank" class="">https://docs.kde.org/trunk5/en/extragear-edu/kstars/index.html</a><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There seems to be some issue now where the manual has not been updated to reflect the latest additions (e.g. I put in a section about Analyze on August 17, but it is still not showing up). Once that issue is resolved (I have no info about that), then I can update the Ekos Guider and Analyze sections. Perhaps others can pick a section or two?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Hy </div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:05 AM Wolfgang Reissenberger <<a href="mailto:sterne-jaeger@openfuture.de" target="_blank" class="">sterne-jaeger@openfuture.de</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="">Same for me, sounds good.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">My question is how we should handle the two bug fixes contained in <a href="https://invent.kde.org/education/kstars/-/merge_requests/60" target="_blank" class="">https://invent.kde.org/education/kstars/-/merge_requests/60</a> At least one of the bugs is quite severe: currently, EKOS cannot handle two meridian flips in the same session.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">On the other side, the entire meridian flip functionality is quite complex and each fix bears the risk of regressions. That’s why I concentrated on developing automated test cases, which are meanwhile included in MR 60. They cover the most common situations where a meridian flip occurred.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">From my perspective, it would make sense to include MR 60 into v3.5.0 - as long as the MR review is successful.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Wolfgang<br class=""><div class=""><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Am 01.10.2020 um 06:20 schrieb Hy Murveit <<a href="mailto:murveit@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">murveit@gmail.com</a>>:</div><br class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Sounds good--perhaps a couple of weeks testing, assuming all goes well.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">For me, it would be good to know ahead of time any StellarSolver algorithmic (sextractor parameter) changes to </div><div class="">focus and guider, or if the changes should be identical from a numbers point of view--just quicker/better.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Hy</div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:07 PM Jasem Mutlaq <<a href="mailto:mutlaqja@ikarustech.com" target="_blank" class="">mutlaqja@ikarustech.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class="">Hello everyone,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Today I discussed StellarSolver integration progress with Robert and it's coming along nicely. I think within a week we'd have a version that can be tested by users. Then perhaps we give another 7-10 after that for a full release of v3.5.0?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The other major milestone is DSO: integration <a href="https://invent.kde.org/education/kstars/-/merge_requests/93" target="_blank" class="">https://invent.kde.org/education/kstars/-/merge_requests/93</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Though I think this would probably slip to v3.5.1 since it's still in progress, but very promising indeed and Valentine would make KStars finally load large DSOs catalogs without significant performance impacts!</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Are there any pending milestones for this release?<br clear="all" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">--</div><div class="">Best Regards,<br class="">Jasem Mutlaq<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>