[Kst] .ui.h file removal

[Andrew Walker]

There was no particular reason for the removal of the .ui.h
file othar than that I prefer not to have Qt Designer handle
too much of anything. It always seems to me that you can
go so far with it and then it starts to fall apart. Inheritance
is more painful to start with but can be less so in the
long run. But it comes down to personal preference.

Andrew


> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:31:14 -0500
> From: George Staikos <staikos at kde.org>
> Subject: Re: [Kst] kdeextragear-2/kst/kst
> To: kst at kde.org
> Message-ID: <200403261131.14388.staikos at kde.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"
>
> On Friday 26 March 2004 11:06, Andrew Walker wrote:
> > CVS commit by arwalker:
> >
> > Added for log table...
> >
> >
> >   A            kstlogtable.cpp   1.1 [GPL (v2+)]
> >   A            kstlogtable.h   1.1 [GPL (v2+)]
>
>   Thanks.  What was your reasoning for removing usage of the .ui.h file
for
> debugdialog?  I don't think inheritence gains anything over the .ui.h file
in
> this case.  The reason the other dialogs don't tend to use .ui.h is
because
> designer didn't support that at the time they were made.  I think we
should
> use .ui.h files for new dialogs though.
>
> --
> George Staikos
> KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
> Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/