<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
When I try to build against qte2 using a slightly tweaked version of
the qtopia configuration, I get:<br>
<br>
ksock.cpp:105: error: syntax error before `::' token<br>
ksock.cpp:109: error: `sin' was not declared in this scope<br>
ksock.cpp:111: error: `sin' was not declared in this scope<br>
ksock.cpp:111: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `memset' with no
type<br>
ksock.cpp:111: error: `int memset' redeclared as different kind of
symbol<br>
...<br>
<br>
Adam<br>
<br>
Eva Brucherseifer wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid200607052157.06448.eva.brucherseifer@basyskom.de"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Am Mittwoch, 5. Juli 2006 21:52 schrieb Adam Doppelt:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Thanks for the suggestion. I am now trying to compile against qte3 using
your suggested configuration. Unfortunately, the kdenox configure fails
during qt detection with the following:
/tmp/ccgVdTEJ.o:(.gnu.linkonce.r._ZTI6QGList+0x8): undefined reference
to `typeinfo for QPtrCollection'
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
You need threading and RTTI enabled in Qt.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Earlier, I was able to get the Jan 2006 snapshot working against qt2,
but it crashed on my test page. I figured I'd try trunk and see if it
worked better.
I don't have a preference for qte2 vs. qte3. My primary interest is the
browser itself. Any other suggestions?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Ah, if you want qte2, have a look into the kdenox-qtopia.kdevelop file, it
works with Qtopia 2.1. I am not sure I commited a pure qte2 version, but it
is not much different.
With Qte2 you can use the ROAD GUI (--with-gui=road) which is what we've
worked on the last months. It is certainly more polished then the other GUIs
and it has some additional (tested) features.
Cheers,
eva
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>