<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/9/2013 3:44 PM, Łukasz Maszczyński
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAA29HJP0t1A4ntPpD7wWaReV3KwfNhJhdEQye0f55e9iihbtOA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2013/2/7 Michael Wolfe <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:wolfemi1@gmail.com"><wolfemi1@gmail.com></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 2/6/2013 9:45 AM, Łukasz Maszczyński wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Problem did NOT show up today when I tried to update; everything appears to
be working now (just as I had the bug report mostly filled out!). I did NOT
update or recompile since yesterday.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Hmm, then most probably the content of OFX changed in the meantime
(one download different than the other), which would explain why you
observed the problem for a short time only. My guess is that the
transaction's bankId-s were messed up, in that case you wouldn't even
see the difference, but the application would interpret the
transactions in a bit different way.
One way or another - the OFX file you sent me looks fine, and
importing it multiple times does produce desired result - transaction
duplicates are found and matched. If you ever see the problem again,
please save the broken OFX and send us the anonymized version of it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Hello again. It has happened again, and I've filed a bug report (<a
class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED ---
- Transactions not matched from OFX direct download for one
account, not others"
href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315072">315072</a>)
with an attached OFX log. Thanks for the interest!<br>
<br>
-Mike<br>
</body>
</html>