Thomas,<br><br>I'm having a problem with my 2 credit card accounts in 3.97.2. While reading over the threads that I mentioned in my last email I think is a reference to this problem in KMM2. If you don't see what I'm talking about I'll dig deeper tomorrow but I suspect one of your fixes did not make it to 3.9x.<br>
<br>Here's part of the text that you sent me in the middle of troubleshooting this problem (hoping this jogs your memory).<br>==============================================================<br>The reason why it is not matching the account automatically is, that the resp.<br>
field in the kmm-statement file is empty (acctid).<br><br>Usually, mapping an account sets up an id made out of the routing number and<br>the account number. If the routing number is not present, it is left blank.<br>This id is stored with the KMyMoney account information.<br>
<br>When an OFX statement is downloaded, the two fields are extracted again and<br>the id is constructed the same way as done during mapping and the resp.<br>KMyMoney account is searched.<br><br>Looking at your OFX file, the routing number (usually transmitted as BANKID<br>
field in the OFX datastream) is not present. If it was present during<br>mapping, I know why it's 'failing' to find the account.<br><br>We can figure that out by looking at your kmy file. Convert it into a readable<br>
format (see<br><a href="http://kmymoney2.sourceforge.net/online-manual/details.formats.html">http://kmymoney2.sourceforge.net/online-manual/details.formats.html</a> how to do<br>that in case you don't know). I am interested in the value part of the<br>
following construct for the CC account<br><br> <PAIR key="kmmofx-acc-ref" value="xxxx-yyyy" /><br><br>where xxxx is the bankid and yyyy is the account id. Is xxx filled or empty?<br>Does yyy match the information of the acctid value in the OFX statement you<br>
sent to me?<br>==============================================================<br>--<br>Brendan<br><br><br><br>On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Brendan Coupe <<a href="mailto:brendan@coupeware.com">brendan@coupeware.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Thomas,<br>><br>> I worked with your on this in the first half of last year. This is what I found:<br>><br>> KMM2 developer list:<br>><br>> Look for the subject "Feature Request - Update All Accounts Behavior"<br>
> submitted on 2009.06.09, you replied on 2009.07.02.<br>><br>> There may be some relevant info in a thread with the subject "Feature<br>> Request - Update" started on 2009.04.08.<br>><br>> and one with the subject "Feature Request" started on 2009.01.11. I<br>
> think this was my first request for this feature.<br>><br>> To be clear (because one of your responses that I just read is not how<br>> the feature ended up in KMM2), if I update one account and there are<br>
> new transactions I get the summary. If there are no new transactions I<br>> do not get the summary.<br>><br>> If I update all accounts and there are new transactions in any of the<br>> accounts I get one summary at the end and there is a summary for each<br>
> account that had new transactions. If none of the accounts have new<br>> transactions then I do not get the summary.<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>><br>> --<br>> Brendan<br>><br>><br>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Thomas Baumgart <<a href="mailto:thb@net-bembel.de">thb@net-bembel.de</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>>> Hi,<br>>><br>>> on Thursday 15 April 2010 Brendan Coupe wrote:<br>>><br>>><br>>> > Some time in the past year or so the online import process was changed in<br>>> > KMM2 so that the "Statement Stats" screen at the end of the import process<br>
>> > was only shown if there were new transactions added to an account.<br>>> ><br>>> > I just installed KMM 3.97.2 and the summary screens are back. Luckily when<br>>> > I update all of my accounts I only get one summary screen at the end but<br>
>> > it shows all accounts, even the accounts with no new transactions.<br>>> ><br>>> > Is there an option I can set so that I only get the "Statement Stats" if I<br>>> > have new transactions?<br>
>><br>>> Not that I know. Maybe the change in 1.0.x was done past the creation of 3.9x<br>>> which lives in a separate source repository. I'll check into that. If you have<br>>> a hint what "some time in the past year" might be in more detail, it will ease<br>
>> my search. TIA. If you can't, I need to grab the large shovel for digging :)<br>>><br>>> --<br>>><br>>><br>>> Regards<br>>><br>>> Thomas Baumgart<br>>><br>>> GPG-FP: E55E D592 F45F 116B 8429 4F99 9C59 DB40 B75D D3BA<br>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------<br>>> Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.<br>>> (Rich Kulawiec)<br>>> -------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br><br>