<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Cristian Oneţ <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:onet.cristian@gmail.com">onet.cristian@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Alvaro Soliverez<<a href="mailto:asoliverez@gmail.com">asoliverez@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hello all,<br>
> I have been working on porting this class to a KDE4 one. From what I<br>
> understand, this class should be moved to a proxy, because it deals<br>
> primarily with filtering items.<br>
> It has some other functionality, which should be moved to the corresponding<br>
> widgets because it is mostly about whether items can be selected or checked.<br>
> This class is inherited by kmymoneyaccountselector, and used by<br>
> kmymoneycombo, and kmymoneycompletion, so all those will have to change too<br>
> in time.<br>
> In a first stage, I will only change kmymoneyaccountselector to a KDE4<br>
> widget, to prove the approach is solid.<br>
> Also, this will help get the ledgers in a usable state.<br>
><br>
> Any thoughts on this?<br>
</div></div>As a developer I would say yeah go ahead :) but as a user who would<br>
like to get his hands as fast as possible on a usable (just the basics<br>
really no online banking and stuff) kde4 version of kmymoney (since<br>
its the only application that keeps my kde-libs 3.5 on my system) I<br>
would say: Wouldn't it be easier to make it work without re-writing<br>
and refactor it after it works?<br>
But if you judge that it's better this way it's OK from my POW. I know<br>
that while searching for the reason the widgets pop-ups were not<br>
working (this is the way I learned about the Qt::Popup widget flag :)<br>
) I saw that the Qt combo widget had the same architecture and I was<br>
thinking that maybe it would be easier to replace the kmymoney widget<br>
with a corresponding Qt widget but then I taught of all the small<br>
customizations that the kmymoney widget has and I said to myself:<br>
leave it that way for now...<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Yes, I have been looking at the widget for some time, and I think that it will be easier to port it, rather than try to fix it.<br>Just like you, I'm very wary of getting into porting the widget to the Qt4 widget. That's why I sent this email on the first place.<br>
I will look a little further into it before doing any real work.<br><br>In the meantime, is there any other area you think I could get my hands dirty on? :)<br><br>