<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Ramón Miranda <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mirandagraphic@gmail.com">mirandagraphic@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">I agree with Boud <br><div class="im"><div>" they only want to know what part of their work will be covered (approximately)." <br>
</div></div>I need to Know how much surface i am going to cover with my brushtroke. That is what i called accurate work. and i think we only need that an outline of the brush, not two. <br>
anyway the bigger size of pressure at 100% will be enough . Right now i found ok on Pixel Brush (see attached image) . but when the outline is complex ,brush looks weird. and tends to be slower. (see attached image) maybe a simplified outline would be better .<div>
<div></div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><a href="http://www.pasteall.org/pic/15158" target="_blank">http://www.pasteall.org/pic/15158</a> <br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>I have now readded the code that skips the path inside. Please checkout if that is simple enough. <br>
</div></div>