<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Dmitry Kazakov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dimula73@gmail.com">dimula73@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:boud@valdyas.org" target="_blank">boud@valdyas.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>On Saturday 06 February 2010, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:<br>
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Dmitry Kazakov wrote:<br>
> > Hi, All.<br>
> ><br>
> > It seems some commit made the trunk very slow. The painting became slow<br>
> > even with predefined brushes.<br>
> > The reference revision that was fast: r1083631<br>
> > Slow revision: r1085960<br>
> ><br>
> > Something bad happened between them =)<br>
><br>
> The interesting thing is that, for the rest of us, painting became a lot<br>
> faster.<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div>Maybe i have some debugging (of shared for example) enabled. I have a debug version with all the defaults (i haven't changed any values in leak debugger).<br></blockquote>
</div><br>Yes, it was because of activated "Backtrace support" in memory leak checker.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dmitry Kazakov<br>