<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:9pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:<br>
> But that doesn't matter much: there can be many reasons for not being able<br>
> to reproduce them apart from "they got accidentally fixed".<br>
But it makes it hard to fix them...<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>> > > And it's not just crashes that fall under "stability",<br>
> > > things like bug 205644 cause data loss, so that's a stability issue<br>
> > > too.<br>
> ><br>
> > yes and it's a release blocker.<br>
><br>
> Of course. And it means we've not yet achieved a high degree of stability.<br>
I am not arguing with that :) I am just saying it's a bit difficult to work on this when you can't reproduce the crashes, or that they are not reported.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>-- <br>
Cyrille Berger</p></body></html>