<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:9pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Tuesday 15 September 2009, Thomas Zander wrote:<br>
> On Tuesday 15. September 2009 21.52.32 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:<br>
> > * performance: krita just is too slow to work with. 1.6 was slow, but not<br>
> > too slow, 2.x is way too slow. This prevents me from actually having fun<br>
> > painting, more than a lack of features of our brush engines.<br>
><br>
> Do you think these are solvable?<br>
I hope so :)<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>> Do you have an idea where the issues are or how to attack them?<br>
As far as I am concern, I didn't had time to take care of that so far... I used 2.1 as an opportunity to rework some of the things that were introduced in 2.0 and that wasn't done to my satisfaction. Maybe we could set 2.2 on the sign performance.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>-- <br>
Cyrille Berger</p></body></html>