Layer usuability idea

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:25, Casper Boemann wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2005 08:48, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 23:06, Mr YouP wrote:
> > > :-).oh, I think I couldn't wait, I'll try to find a moment to compile
> > > : cvs
> > >
> > > (svn?) tree before (because all I read on the ML this last times make
> > > me very impatient and klik has something against me)
> > >
> > > Many thanks Casper :)
> >
> > I do hope you manage to test this feature for us; it needs some input
> > yet. For instance, would it be better to have the active layer
> > temporarily on top if the visualisation is activated? Optionally? There's
> > plenty of room for fine-tuning after this feature gets fixed...
>
> yeah - i don't do any further work on it before i get some more feedback

The most import question is -- after obvious stuff like choice of colors and 
enable/disable -- whether the active layer should be painted on top of all 
layers when this feature is on. Currently, it's not possible to form a mental 
map of what's happening.

If we want people to play with it, it may be best to add the option and 
commit, otherwise not many people will see it.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20051110/9f1dd42b/attachment.pgp