<div dir="ltr">Erm, we are in the process of migrating kget (and the rest of kdenetwork) from svn to git, when did you plan on making this change? I would suggest doing the change after KGet is safely in git, which should be early next week in order to give us time to verify everything has moved and tarballs can be built right, etc.<div>
<br></div><div style>BR,</div><div style>Jeremy</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Allen Winter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:winter@kde.org" target="_blank">winter@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 07:03:09 PM David Narvaez wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I would like to request an exception for the Dependency Freeze in the<br>
> case of KGet to add a dependency on Nepomuk Core and Nepomuk Widgets.<br>
><br>
</div>Since other parts of KDE SC already required both of these afaik,<br>
I don't think this is a problem at all.<br>
<br>
So request granted from me. Unless I'm completely missing the point.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
> The situation is that KGet already provides Nepomuk integration, which<br>
> provides features like auto tagging and download history. I worked on<br>
> restoring the download history code, which was more or less broken,<br>
> for KDE SC 4.10 but made a note to port the trunk version to Nepomuk2<br>
> to avoid some quirks that will not be fixed in Nepomuk. Unfortunately,<br>
> I had very little time to hack on KDE the last couple of months and I<br>
> just found time to do the port. It would be good to have this go into<br>
> the betas for KDE SC 4.11 to have more time to test, but I'm very<br>
> confident that this code is working since the migration is more or<br>
> less automated by now.<br>
><br>
> To clarify, this does not introduce any new feature to KGet, just<br>
> implements the same optional Nepomuk features using Nepomuk2 which is<br>
> actively maintained and improved. I'm CCing Lukas Appelhans, the<br>
> maintainer of KGet (who agrees with introducing this dependency) and<br>
> Vishesh Handa who is maintaining Nepomuk2.<br>
><br>
> I am open to any questions or clarifications.<br>
><br>
> David E. Narváez<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> release-team mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:release-team@kde.org">release-team@kde.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
release-team mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:release-team@kde.org">release-team@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>