<table><tr><td style="">mwolff created this revision.<br />mwolff added a reviewer: KDevelop.<br />Restricted Application added a subscriber: kdevelop-devel.<br />mwolff requested review of this revision.
</td><a style="text-decoration: none; padding: 4px 8px; margin: 0 8px 8px; float: right; color: #464C5C; font-weight: bold; border-radius: 3px; background-color: #F7F7F9; background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom,#fff,#f1f0f1); display: inline-block; border: 1px solid rgba(71,87,120,.2);" href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D9922" rel="noreferrer">View Revision</a></tr></table><br /><div><strong>REVISION SUMMARY</strong><div><p>By changing the test client back to what it expects. Blindly also<br />
adapt the LLDB test which introduced the regression in the first<br />
place. Note that I cannot run the LLDB test locally, so I'm not<br />
sure whether the test passes there.</p>

<p>Still, don't break GDB tests, people are using those...</p></div></div><br /><div><strong>REPOSITORY</strong><div><div>R32 KDevelop</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>BRANCH</strong><div><div>master</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>REVISION DETAIL</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D9922" rel="noreferrer">https://phabricator.kde.org/D9922</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>AFFECTED FILES</strong><div><div>plugins/debuggercommon/tests/debuggees/qurl.cpp<br />
plugins/lldb/unittests/test_lldbformatters.cpp</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>To: </strong>mwolff, KDevelop<br /><strong>Cc: </strong>kdevelop-devel<br /></div>