<html>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
<table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 solid;">
<tr>
<td>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
<a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110107/">http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110107/</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" style="background-image: url('http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/static/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.ab6f3b1072c9.png'); background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black solid;">
<tr>
<td>
<div>Review request for KDevelop.</div>
<div>By Sven Brauch.</div>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Currently each working set gets a random icon from some application, which looks very weird. For example, it used the alarm function icon, and did lots of things like desaturate it, which in the end made everything look very confusing and messy in my opinion.
This patch instead replaces the icons by colored dots, inspired by konversation's default nicklist icons. They are easy to differentiate, look clean, and are not associated with totally different things by the user.
Additionally, the new icons are generated at run-time, and are completely calculated from the working set's ID. Thus, lots of messy code which iterates through possible icons, checks if they're already being used, saves them to a config file, loads them from a config file etc. was removed. Of course this comes at the price of painting the new icons, but the code doing that is contained in one single, obvious function and not splattered around everywhere. Also, the icons are no longer involved in deciding which working sets should be loaded on startup (sic).
It could be discussed if the icon could still be improved optically, especially I don't like the blue vs. darkgrey contrast too much -- suggestions are welcome!</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Testing </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Manually tested creating and removing working sets in various conditions, and also tested closing and re-opening kdevelop with various working set setups. Seems okay.</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">
<li>shell/workingsetcontroller.h <span style="color: grey">(9697a99)</span></li>
<li>shell/workingsetcontroller.cpp <span style="color: grey">(3b4f90c)</span></li>
<li>shell/workingsets/workingset.h <span style="color: grey">(ae2aa94)</span></li>
<li>shell/workingsets/workingset.cpp <span style="color: grey">(cac0d54)</span></li>
<li>shell/workingsets/workingsettoolbutton.cpp <span style="color: grey">(c890049)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110107/diff/" style="margin-left: 3em;">View Diff</a></p>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">File Attachments </h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/04/20/workingsets.png">old workingset icons</a></li>
<li><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/04/20/workingsets_new.png">new workingset icons</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>