<html><head></head><body><br>
I follow the qt creator mailing list as well. That blog post is optimistic. Qt creator has a branch with support for a clang parser, but there is still a lot of debate if it will ever become mainline. There are some who feel their current parser is better.<br>
<br>
It would be cool to replace our current parsers as an experiment. On the next rev of the C/C++ standards (at least 5 years, based on history 10+) it would be nice to have something close enough to working we can make an intelligent decision on if it is worth maintaining our own parser anymore.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Alexander Shaduri <ashaduri@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif"><br />Hello,<br /><br />On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:00:21 +0900<br />Alexandre Courbot wrote:<br /><br />> How about a project for a DUChain builder based on CLang? Provided<br />> this is doable (I played a little bit with CLang and don't see any<br />> reason why it would not be so far), there are many advantages:<br />> ...<br /><br />In case someone doesn't know this yet, Qt Creator is switching to Clang:<br /><a href="http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/10/19/qt-creator-and-clang">http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/10/19/qt-creator-and-clang</a>/<br /><br />Cheers,<br />Alexander<br /><br />-- <br />KDevelop-devel mailing list<br />KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org<br /><a href="https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel">https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>