Restructuring the kdevelop.git folder layout

Kevin Funk kfunk at kde.org
Wed Sep 6 07:32:40 UTC 2017


On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 05:09:14 CEST Morten Volden wrote:
> +1 for the change overall.
> 
> I would prefer to keep kdevplatform as is, but maybe that is just me.

Heya,

No strong opinions on that one either. I can actually leave that out to 
minimize the number of renames. That particular folder is very easy to rename 
afterwards anyway.

Moving the *plugins* is the most important change, to make it easier to 
navigate the KDevelop code base.

Regards,
Kevin


> /Morten
> 
> 2017-09-06 3:07 GMT+04:00 Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org>:
> > +1 to the change overall
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Sven Brauch <mail at svenbrauch.de> wrote:
> > > On 06/09/17 00:18, Kevin Funk wrote:
> > >> Reasoning:
> > >> - Make it easier to understand the kdevelop.git layout for newcomers.
> > >> - Make the layout more consistent.
> > > 
> > > Looks sensible to me, except one thing maybe: do we really want
> > > languages in plugins/languages/? To me it would also make sense -- and
> > > be shorter and easier to find -- if they were in a dedicated languages/
> > > folder. Sure, they are technically plugins, but ...
> > 
> > I agree that it feels weird, but maybe it's just because 3-level deep
> > is already quite deep?
> > 
> > Maybe it would make sense to have all plugins in plugins
> > (kdevelop/plugns/cmake, kdevelop/plugins/python,
> > kdevelop/plugins/clang).
> > 
> > Aleix


-- 
Kevin Funk | kfunk at kde.org | http://kfunk.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20170906/a6063875/attachment.sig>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list