libclang5 vs libclang4? (and anecdotal evidence of a potential deadlock during startup)

[Sven Brauch]

On 16/11/17 11:50, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> This should be more on-topic: is there any advantage to using
> libclang5 instead of libclang4 for the kdev-clang parser?

I still consider this off-topic, of course we want to use the new
version with the new features and the new fixes for our application.
Talking about what wouldn't break when using the old version isn't
moving us forward at all.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20171116/aeb79cf7/attachment.sig>