Moving KDevelop4 from trunk/KDE/ to trunk/extragear/sdk

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Mon Oct 1 13:13:49 UTC 2007


On 01.10.07 16:11:03, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> On Monday 01 October 2007 15:48, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > I completely disagree. Being in keg hasn't been a problem for some of
> > the major KDE apps, like amarok or k3b. None of them suffered from being
> > in k3b and keg in KDE4 is an _official_ part of the release, we're going
> > to get a KDevelop release with any KDE 4.x release we want, without any
> > extra overhead, except creating a tag before the KDE4.x tagging.
> 
> Yes, but those apps are much more popular than us.

And you think that they would be even more popular with another place in
svn? I doubt that, IMHO its more about releasing together with the rest
of KDE and we get that in keg as well. I mean few people look at svn and
build from source, compared to those that just fetch the package from
their distro and for those the place in svn doesn't matter at all. I
really doubt distro's will drop kdevelop just because its moved
elsewhere in svn and doesn't follow the kde version numbering scheme.

Andreas

-- 
Tonight's the night: Sleep in a eucalyptus tree.




More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list