The result of the whole discussion about Gideon and 2.2 (was: Re: A common roadmap)

[Richard Dale]

On Monday 01 April 2002 12:20 pm, Christian Couder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Dale wrote:
> > I don't think reorganising the CVS like this is a good idea, either with
> > adding new branches or moving things around, or both. We might lose the
> > cvs history and that will make it harder to maintain both gideon and
> > KDevelop.
>
> I am not a CVS expert but I heard that there are hacks to do it properly
> and not lose anything.
>
> > I would prefer to either leave things as they are, or better give gideon
> > a new name (probably with a K in it) and move it to kdesdk.
>
> Anyway this would mean to lose gideon's CVS history if we are not able to
> hack cvs files properly.
>
> > If there is a
> > need for a common development kparts directory, that could go into kdesdk
> > too, and still be used by KDevelop.
>
> Then why not move KDevelop to kdesdk too ?
Yes, I would vote for two seperate apps in kdesdk with cvs histories preserved 
if possible. The only thing I don't like is the name 'gideon' - all it does 
is remind me of bibles in hotel rooms..

-- Richard