Bug#34497: seg fault when adding files to project

F@lk Brettschneider gigafalk at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 5 08:12:03 UTC 2001


jbb wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2001 20:32, you wrote:
> > jbb wrote:
> (...)
> > > > >
> > > > > (no debugging symbols found)...0x411d0989 in __wait4 ()
> > > > >    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
> > > > > #0  0x411d0989 in __wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
> > > > > #1  0x4124c534 in __DTOR_END__ () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
> > > > > #2  0x409a4838 in KCrash::defaultCrashHandler () at eval.c:41
> > > > > #3  <signal handler called>
> > > > > #4  0x0806f258 in CToolClass::writeToolConfig () at eval.c:41
> > > > > #5  0x0806da2c in CToolClass::writeToolConfig () at eval.c:41
> > > > > #6  0x080a1791 in CToolClass::writeToolConfig () at eval.c:41
> > > > > #7  0x08148141 in CToolClass::writeToolConfig () at eval.c:41
> > > > > #8  0x08079cd1 in CToolClass::writeToolConfig () at eval.c:41
> > > >
> > > > I'd really like to know what that crash means.
> > >
> > > ... the debugger (gdb) is a tad confused...
> >
> > Do you mean because of optimized code? Did they set -O0 on?
> 
> In this case, our poor wee debugger is fighting a lack of info due to ...
> (no debugging symbols found)
So this is again a useless backtrace because of the not set
"--enable-debug" flag.
It would save from 1000 useless bugreports, if KCrash didn't create
backtraces in case of release-compiled programs.

Ciao,F at lk

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«



More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list