<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>Thanks a lot, Ingo</tt><tt>!<br>
</tt></div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1854386.PYKUYFuaPT@collossus.localdomain"><tt>It's great
that many people in this thread try to help, but I have the
impression that Martin (and me) are the only people who have
really understood what you, Michael, want to do.
I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to use the system
PostgreSQL server instead of a standalone one.<br>
What do you hope to gain by this?</tt><tt><br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt>OK, may be my poor understanding: I use PostgreSQL very much
with different databases, so "my PostgreSQL-server" is running
almost full-time. In the past I understood from this list, that
usage of PostgreSQL for Akonadi is the better choice. So <u>my
approach</u> was to have one server only, for "my usage" and for
Akonadi. <br>
<br>
Actually (on older hardware) my PostgreSQL-installation has two
databases: <br>
</tt>
<ul>
<li><tt>postgres (the standard one) with scheme public,<br>
</tt></li>
<li><tt>myDB with several (personal) schemes and public.</tt></li>
</ul>
<tt>My approach for the new setup: Transfer both and add a new one
"Akonadi". The reasons for <u>my understanding</u>: Less
processes running, less installation, less update, configuration
easier to understand. But: If it's preferable have two servers and
you recommend this, it can be done but I have to understand the
install (how to get the PackageManager to install the installed
package PostgreSQL again?) and update-processes for both.<br>
<br>
Which solution is your recommendation:<br>
A: One PostgreSQL-installation, three databases: </tt><tt><tt>postgres,
</tt>myDB, Akonadi.<br>
B: </tt><tt><tt>One PostgreSQL-installation, two databases:
postgres, myDB; let Akonadi use postgres.<br>
C: Two </tt></tt><tt><tt><tt><tt>PostgreSQL-installation</tt></tt></tt></tt><tt>s:<br>
C1: T</tt><tt><tt><tt>wo databases: postgres, myDB; <br>
C2: postgres OR Akonadi for Akonadi <br>
</tt></tt></tt><tt><br>
Let's decide this question first! </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>I've seen, that you already answered my To-Do-list (your
mail 18:09 h); may be, we can update this after the decision?</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Thank you and regards, Michael</tt><tt><br>
</tt><br>
</body>
</html>