[Bug 86423] Ability To Reply To HTML Email With Same HTML Format As It Was Received

[Kevin Coonan]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86423





--- Comment #219 from Kevin Coonan <kevin coonan gmail com>  2011-03-14 21:35:49 ---
That sounds like a logical approach.  KDE 3.5.10 was a very functional 
desktop, and I am not sure I am any more functional w/ 4.6 (maybe less since I 
keep playing around with it).

One thing that would help a lot of us is understanding the implications of 
running KDE 3.5 software under 4.6 and vice-versa.

But, even in KDE 4.6 it still does not work!

Do we have an ETA of when this will be done?

Thanks
Kevin

Kevin M. Coonan, MD
Bethesda, MD
kevin.coonan {GMail, Skype}

Omnes homines liberi aequique dignitate atque juribus nascuntur. Ratione 
conscientiaque praediti sunt et alii erga alios cum fraternitate se gerere 
debent.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are 
endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a 
spirit of brotherhood.
Article I. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948-12-10, Paris, France


On Saturday, March 12, 2011 16:14:42 John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86423
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Comment #218 from John A. Sullivan III <jsullivan opensourcedevel com> 
> 2011-03-12 22:14:31 ---
> 
> On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 14:28 +0100, Divan Santana wrote:
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86423
> 
> <snip>
> I should clarify the points raised.  They have been discussed in detail
> earlier on but this thread has grown long.
> 
> First of all, KDE3 is alive and well in the Trinity project.  There are
> a number of production installations which do not feel KDE4 is ready for
> production usage.  This is not the place to have that debate. Some feel
> it is, some feel it is not.  We cannot judge another's environment
> unless we are in it.
> 
> The bucket system was set up to accommodate both and prevent taking
> advantage of either "camp."  The idea was for contributors to contribute
> to whichever bucket they preferred.  If the KDE4 bucket filled before
> the KDE3 bucket, as we suspect will happen, all funds then flow to the
> KDE3 bucket since it is the dependent project.  If the KDE3 bucket never
> fills, the project, at least from that developer dies.  What we wanted
> to avoid was KDE4 users paying into the KDE3 development and then there
> not being enough left over for the KDE4 port.  Similarly, we did not
> want KDE3 users stymied if there was enough contribution to do the KDE3
> project but not enough for KDE4.  Hence the dual bucket approach.
> Thanks - John

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.