<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 03/31/12 14:28, Kevin Krammer wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:201203311058.36416.krammer@kde.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Saturday, 2012-03-31, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:randommail@mac.hush.com">randommail@mac.hush.com</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">There is Linus Torwalds. And there is me. I was born at the same
holiday as him.
And I will be talking as he.
Who did you PAY to include AKONADI?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I can't speak for the other users on this list, but I for myself did not pay
for it since I am using a gratis distribution (Debian).
Who did you pay for it?
Cheers,
Kevin
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Actually, as you know, Akonadi is a good idea, it should remain
transparent to the user as NetworkManager does.<br>
<br>
The problem comes when it encounters it's bugs -- the HUGS number of
bugs that KDE has which makes it's deployment in enterprise
environments imposable.<br>
<br>
Honestly, KDE is a headache for admins, bugs here, bugs there, and
there're new bugs with every release and everyone's talking about
it.<br>
<br>
I think some of it's apps should be suspended form development...
like 'kscd' and 'kmail' etc.... they never worked, and I don't think
they ever will. In the mean time serious bugs like the buggy
taskbar, kdesu/sudo integration and puseaudio input configuration is
still broken.<br>
<br>
My personal opinion is, for the size of the KDE project, it's surely
missing sponsors.<br>
</body>
</html>