<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 6:59 AM Christoph Cullmann <<a href="mailto:christoph@cullmann.io">christoph@cullmann.io</a>> wrote:</div><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
> <br>
<br>
> <br>
<br>
> Hi folks,<br>
> <br>
<br>
> Microsoft is offering some kind of engineering support for people that publish<br>
> apps-for-windows, in getting those apps to also work on Windows-on-ARM and<br>
> CoPilot+ PCs (I suppose that means "An ARM CPU with some neural co-processor<br>
> tacked on"). If there's any interest, we can set you up with them, otherwise<br>
> we'll decline this thrilling opportunity.<br>
> <br>
<br>
> [ade]<br>
> <br>
<br>
> PS. Feel free to pass this on, I don't really know where KDE-on-Windows lives<br>
> these days.<br>
<br>
I guess that just would mean adding ARM Windows support and builders for craft.<br>
<br>
Not sure if that makes real sense given the sparse use of ARM Windows machines and I guess<br>
MS will not just pay our building machines and I don't see any need for engineering support :)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This would mostly be an engineering thing, as we already have ARM native hardware to support Flatpak and Snap builds as both of those do not support cross compilation (sadly, as the ARM hardware is at least 2x the cost of amd64 hardware)</div><div><br></div><div>As far as I am aware though Windows on ARM isn't something that can be freely / easily downloaded?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
But that is just my opinion.<br>
<br>
Greetings<br>
Christoph</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Ben </div></div></div>