<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">07.11.06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Christian Ehrlicher</b> <<a href="mailto:Ch.Ehrlicher@gmx.de">Ch.Ehrlicher@gmx.de</a>> ΞΑΠΙΣΑΜ(Α):</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Igor Mironchick schrieb:<br>> Good evening.<br>> 7z packages are usefull.<br>> But I can't understand for what this race after the universality. Is it so<br>> necessary to combine all functionality in a one DLL??? In my apinion this
<br>> this may cause only problems, cause there is must to be a standart.<br>><br>What do you mean? There is no one big lib.</blockquote><div><br>I mean combinig pcre and pcreposix => (I simply added pcre.dll functionality to
pcreposix.dll) <br></div><br><div>I understood. You want to do a collection of libraries needed only for compiling KDE and no more.The point is that I try to use this libraries not only for KDE4 and sometimes i have problems like unresolved externals. Therewere I had compile this libraries from sources. And how you know, Christian, on mingw this need some time... :)
<br><br>But sometimes may happen that lib*.a or lib*.dll.a will not have all symbols needed by *.dll<br>Because, how i can see, you compile *.dll with msvc and after compile lib*.a with mingw. Is it so?<br><br>P.S. I'm sorry if I mislead somebody.
<br></div><br></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Regards,<br>Igor Mironchick,<br>Intervale ©<br>#ICQ 240-470-525